Talk:Senedd building/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Way too many lists! Needs to be cut back on the lists.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   One reference needed; marked with {{fact}}

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Very on-topic.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Follows NPOV

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Many great images/

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Good article. I like those table with the colors. Really only one problem in this article: the lists. If those list are removed, I think this article has potential for FA. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)