Jump to content

Talk:Atlantic Star (cruise ship)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Sky Wonder)

Should this page not just redirect to Pacific Sky??? --ChrisW 11:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering this ship has changed ownership, I'd think most definitely not. However if redirections really are preferred, the correct thing to do would be to rename the Pacific Sky article to Fairsky (her original name) and redirect to there from Pacific Sky, Sky Princess and Sky Wonder.

I disagree with your statement, "rename the Pacific Sky article to Fairsky (her original name)". She was most known as Pacific Sky. The original Pacific Sky article should be kept in the state that it is, dedicated to the ship as it were when owned by P&O Cruises.

However, on Pacific Sky page, provide a link to here Sky Wonder. It would make sense to do it this way. --ChrisW 01:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny kind of increase

[edit]

In the General Characteristics section, it state the gross tonnage as 46,087 tonnes, then goes on to say that when fully laden it increases to 31,000 tonnes. Should that read increases by 31,000 tonnes? Pedrocelli 10:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concern: Accuracy of 'Active' Life of Ship

[edit]

The text of the article indicates "...was a cruise ship built in 1984. Laid up for years...". I took an 11 day cruise on the Sitmar Fairsky in March 1985 from Los Angeles to the (Western) Mexican Riviera. I am reasonably certain the ship was not 'laid up' during that period. --HLogic (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@HLogic: I think I've cleared up the ship's history a bit. Let me know what you think. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 22:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Atlantic Star (cruise ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Atlantic Star (cruise ship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]