Talk:Steve Evans (footballer, born 1962)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found that this article is in general a very good piece of work, but there is one issue that needs to be addressed.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is OK, perhaps 6/10.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

Two major problems here: firstly, the personal life and early life sections are skimpy and scruffy. I strongly suggest merging them togther and expanding if possible (please see Brian Urlacher for a good example of a personal life section). Secondly, the article is 18 months out of date, please bring it up to the present day.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. (If you are really busy, let me know and I'll give more time. I need to know however so I can see that someone is interested in addressing these concerns. Regards --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

OK, as this is not a terriblt article I have held off so far. Unfortunately, no work has been done and I have no choice but to delist this article.--Jackyd101 (talk) 03:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)