Talk:The Color of Crime (book)

A fact from The Color of Crime (book) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in The Color of Crime, Katheryn Russell-Brown writes that crime and young black men have become synonymous in the American mind, giving rise to the "criminalblackman" stereotype?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/September.

Wikipedia

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

On 2 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Color of Crime (1998 book) to The Color of Crime (book). The result of the discussion was moved.

Nicholas Stix[edit]

I don't think we should give Stix's opinion much weight (if any weight at all) given that Stix is an open white nationalist best known for his work with the National Policy Institute. Stonemason89 (talk) 23:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that should necessarily make his views less notable. His article appears to have been published before that organisation was set up. Some identification on him may be appropriate though. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 May 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 11:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Color of Crime (1998 book) → The Color of Crime (book) – Books aren't normally disambiguated by year of publication, and the other item being disambiguated (New_Century_Foundation#The_Color_of_Crime) probably isn't a "book". –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography and WikiProject Books have been notified of this discussion. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 02:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so convinced. If the other The Color of Crime was a movie or an album, I think you'd be right, but it's a publication by Jared Taylor described (in the article) as a monograph and (when I googled it) as a booklet. I think many people might colloquially call such a thing a "book" -- especially if they are looking it up on Wikipedia and don't yet know that it's short. When two books need to be disambiguated from each other (as is the case here), I think the options for further disambiguation are a year, an author last name, or a genre. Genre is the same for both, and I see no reason to prefer author to year. So, I think it works as-is. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The article about The Color of Crime_(1998 book) also includes coverage of the second edition published in 2008. Disambiguation by date would appear to be overly precise. While there are two publications called The Color of Crime, the one by the New Century Foundation is described as a monograph and the only reason for these titles are now being disambiguated is that a redirect has been created to the section about the monograph. That disambiguation is by the publishing organisation, not author. The article about the book might also benefit from having a hatnote to the other disambiguated articles, to avoid confusion. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 05:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.