Talk:Weela Weela Walya/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:The River Saile/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The lead does not summarize the article, it contains material not found in the artcile, and omits material that is in the article. Please read WP:LEAD.
- The ballad has been referenced in various books such "various" here is a weasel word.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- What makes the barely literate website http://www.zeban.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=146:weile-weile-waile&catid=35:song&Itemid=63&lang=en a reliable source?
- The refernce to Sebastian Barry. Annie Dunne Penguin. May 2003 needs a page number.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- This is wehre the artcile falls down. Four sentences, less than a hundred words acbnnot by any means be thought of as broad coverage of the subject
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- None used.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article needs considerable expansion to meet the GA criterion of broad coverage, so I will nto be listing it now. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: