Talk:Three (novel)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Where on IMDB....[edit]

Does it say the movie comes out Jan 5? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NFAN3 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TedDekker Thr3e.jpg[edit]

Image:TedDekker Thr3e.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References?[edit]

No references? Please someone add something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaN Flayer (talk • contribs) 03:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:26, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thr3e → Three (novel)
Thr3e (film) → Three (2006 film)

– Per MOS:TM, we title our articles in a way that most resembles standard English. This seems directly analogous to se7en, which is specifically called out in MOS:TM as an example of a title not to use. Thr3e should be treated the same way. (N.B.: Three (2006 film) currently redirects to Survival Island; if this move is approved, I recommend a hatnote atop the renamed film article to resolve that conflict.) Powers ^T 22:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:MOSTM "se7en" -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; natural disambiguation is preferred. I can understand why some dislike the look of "Thr3e", but it's preferable to making up our own suffix to distinguish it from other things called "Three". It is unfortunate that the MOS is used to justify creating new names for subjects which do not exist in real life; I find that hard to reconcile with encyclopædic principles such as WP:V and anyway the new title is incompatible with the second paragraph of MOS:TM. bobrayner (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's not. Some sources use the title Three, including Ted Dekker's own web site. Powers ^T 20:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh! Thanks for pointing it out. The move request didn't mention that any other source calls it "Three", so I missed it. Nonetheless, on the balance I think it would be better to have natural disambiguation here. bobrayner (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; per Bob (WP:AT/WP:V). Agathoclea (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support clear case of stylized name. The case of the film Seven (film), title stylized as Se7en, seems like the most similar example.--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
support if even the author himself is in not constantly using the stylized spelling I don't see any reason that Wikipedia should.--199.91.207.3 (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.