Talk:Treason by the Book
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
absurd
[edit]It's ridiculous to say this article cites no sources, because it is a summary of a book, ergo, the book is the source for all the assertions. The real question is: is a book summary a legitimate entry? I would say no. The article should be focussed on the plot against the emperor, and then rewritten using not just Spence, but other sources as well. If the summary writer doesn't feel like undertaking the work, then delete the entry.
Theonemacduff (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- The book merits its own article provided there have been non-trivial reviews. There are quite a few. Perspicaris (talk) 22:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Treason by the Book. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141227190025/http://www.wenxueboke.cn/book/book.asp?id=bkbk641138 to http://www.wenxueboke.cn/book/book.asp?id=bkbk641138
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Stub-Class history articles
- Unknown-importance history articles
- Automatically assessed History articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Stub-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles