Talk:Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics
![]() | Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics is part of the Tuvalu at the Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tuvalu at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
- Kees08 Done all except redirect in rio2016, Cyberpower678 told me he'll add it to InternetArchiveBot's repo of dead links. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Kees08 All done. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
@DatGuy: Just those last couple things and we will be good to go. Kees08 (talk) 03:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Tuvalu at the Olympics good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class Olympics articles
- Low-importance Olympics articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- GA-Class Polynesia articles
- Low-importance Polynesia articles
- GA-Class Tuvalu articles
- Low-importance Tuvalu articles
- Tuvalu articles
- WikiProject Polynesia articles