Talk:UEFA Euro 2004 final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "second European Championship. The" overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "second. In the knockout stage," ditto.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any reason for the refs in the infobox for the facts discussed and referenced in the main body, i.e. attendance, referee and MOTM?
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Basinas corner, Greece's" corner should be linked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link header.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Ronaldo had" link.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Sport's" use the {{'s}} to avoid the ' crashing into the s.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "matches, Estádio da Luz hosted numerous notable matches, including UEFA Euro – Quarter-final between Portugal and England in 2004,[13] UEFA Euro Final between Portugal and Greece in 2004" all but "England" already overlinked.
    Fixed.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Previously, 3 group" three.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "eventual-finalists" don't think this needs hyphenation.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • " at the Estádio da Luz in Lisbon on " overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "scored a second from a cross" how?
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "was against England, on" overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "following what BBC Sport described" overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "needing on 4 points and needing" probably don't need that first "needing".
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "faced France, in" overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Chaplin for UEFA as a " overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Pre-match" anything on the squad selections?
    Added.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Phil McNulty" he can be linked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "opportunity with a header on 38 minutes, but his header" repetitive.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "with a free kick" link.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "replaced by Paulo Ferreira in " overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The Guardian's" see above about template. Check others.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Barry Glendenning" can be linked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "for a penalty, but" needs linking to the precise article, but then I guess it will be overlinked...
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "victory at Euro 1992." overlinked.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "upcoming Olympic games"" I think Games is more appropriate.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several refs UEFA.com others just UEFA, be consistent.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Scorelines in ref titles should be unspaced en-dashes, not spaced en-dashes, not unspaced hyphens.
    Done.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I think I've covered all your points above. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 12:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Amakuru, another user has done a "tidy up" overnight, could you just re-check that nothing else was broken (I fixed an errant space before a full stop but have plenty of other things to do than check up on other people's "tidying"), let me know. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: as noted on the article's talk page, I have restored the previous version of the article for the time being as I didn't consider the changes made to be improvements. I'll let you decide what all this means for the GA nomination, but as far as I'm concerned it's in a good state as things stand, pending any other feedback you have here. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, ok. I guess I'll pause momentarily while the other user has a chance to respond, this somewhat undermines the stability of the article for the time being, but there's no deadline, so a day or so more and then I'll make a decision. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Morning @The Rambling Man:. As you'll see on the talk page, both myself and PeeJay are now happy with the wording of the article as it stands now, so hopefully stability is now restored. Is there any chance you can come back and have another look at the GA nom? Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll include it in my GAN sweep later. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]