Jump to content

Talk:USS Sargent Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Sargent Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 05:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Criteria

[edit]

1. Well-written

Prose is clear, concise, and understandable, with proper spelling and grammar checkY
Lead checkY
Layout  Possibly The section for USS Sargent Bay#Construction is only two sentences long. It would be good to expand this section, although I understand that may not be entirely possible. This section could also be consolidated.  Done
Links  Partly done Some article links, such as Operation Magic Carpet are linked in the article multiple times. Generally links should only be used in the first appearance of the topic in an article (not counting the infobox). Also, the redlink to William Theodore Rassieur should probably be dealt with.  Done
Buzzwords checkY
Fiction checkY not an issue with this topic
Lists checkY not applicable

2. Verifiable

List of references properly formatted  Partly done It looks like refs 5 and 8 should be consolidated into a single named ref, since they appear to be quoting the same page of the same book.  Done
Inline citations from reliable sources  Partly done. Can you add inline citations to the various dates in the infobox for verifiability? The dates are cited in the article so it's not a big deal, but having citations there would be nice.
Content cited in article, not big deal.
No original research checkY (none that I can detect).
No COPYVIO checkY I tested several sentences throughout the article, and they came up clean.

3. Broad in coverage

Covers main aspects checkY Design, construction, and service history properly detailed.
Stays focused on topic checkY

4. Neutral checkY

5. Stable checkY

6. Illustrated if possible

Media tagged for copyright details checkY All media tagged as public domain.
Media relevant checkY
@Hog Farm: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Issues mentioned have been addressed. Good job, User:Stikkyy.