Jump to content

Talk:Bombing of Cambodia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:US bombing of Cambodia)

Requested move 31 August 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 06:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


US bombing of CambodiaBombing of Cambodia – The proposed target name already redirects to this disambiguation page, which lists only two topics. We generally shouldn't have shorter ambiguous names redirecting to longer ones that are less ambiguous. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose status quo is more precise, the argument that we can expand it if Cambodia gets bombed again is WP:Crystal ball. Despite this, bombing on its own is more concise and natural
Kowal2701 (talk) 17:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a dab page, so precision is unnecessary. No crystal ball involved. Cambodia was bombed during WWII. See here and here. —Srnec (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the US was the only country to ever bomb Cambodia, that level of specificity does not need to be included in the title of the dab page, especially as it does not seem to be part of the WP:COMMONNAME of the event(s); my impression is that people usually refer to "the bombing of Cambodia", not "the US bombing of Cambodia", perhaps because it is already generally known that this phrase ordinarily refers to a bombing by the US. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.