Talk:Use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War at the Reference desk. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Phosphorus versus thermite or incendiary munitions
[edit]Given the apparent expert agreement that it is not phosphorus if still perhaps some form of indiscriminate weapon, how appropriate is the title? Hipponoticed (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I understand that any Incendiary devices would be covered here, including napalm, thermite, magnesium powder, chlorine trifluoride, or white phosphorus. My very best wishes (talk) 21:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
What's the purpose of this article
[edit]The 2nd paragraph of the lede basically summarizes why anything in this article worth keeping should be merged into the War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine article. Deliberate targeting of civilians, or grossly reckless use in civilian areas, is gonna be a war crime, regardless of whether the weapons are incendiary. I don't see how the use of incendiaries otherwise is significant relative to any other conflict -- there's no dramatic new tech or tactical doctrine (like say there was in Vietnam), and again any gross misuse will surely go into the aforementioned war crimes article.
Recommend merge. SamuelRiv (talk) 05:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- B-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Ukraine articles
- Mid-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles