Talk:2016 Uzbek presidential election

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 September 2016. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

A news item involving 2016 Uzbek presidential election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 December 2016.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Central Asia: Uzbekistan Low‑importance

	Asia portal 2016 Uzbek presidential election is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Uzbekistan portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uzbekistan (assessed as Mid-importance).

Infobox[edit]

I'm getting tired of Panam2014 repeatedly adding the infobox. I have no problem with the code being in the article so that it's ready for when we have some information to put in it, but there is zero point in an infobox until there are some known candidates. For a start, the empty infobox doesn't even display properly (the header is split over three lines) because it is too narrow. Number 5 7 20:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no consensus to remove the infobox . Under best practices, it is recommended that the return while the search for consensus because it represents the ante bellum version. In addition, it is convenient to navigate and have dates. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have it the wrong way round – there was no consensus for you to add it in the first place. This was the ante bellum version – i.e. no infobox. The date is already in the first sentence and there are two links to the previous elections, both in the sidebar and the footer. Number 5 7 20:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to fill a infobox can complete all fields . The infobox is useful as I said. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it is. It doesn't contain anything that's not already in the article, which is only four sentences long. Number 5 7 21:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that no infobox is necessary right now. Intro article and external links box covers all necessary shortcuts. Sputink (talk) 01:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ketmonov 2016 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ketmonov 2016 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]