Talk:Vishnu Smriti

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Hinduism

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 17:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Viṣṇu Smṛti → Vishnu Smriti – To be in line with most other entries e.g. Vishnu, Shiva etc. Also to be in line with WP MOS - The National Library at Kolkata, Romanization, intended for the romanisation of all Indic scripts; is an extension of IAST. Also the Hamari Boli initiative aims for a reunified Hindu/Urdu written using the Roman alphabet. Iztwoz (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - can you please link to Project Talk, RfC or MOS where naming conventions for Hindu/Sanskrit texts have been established. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support to Vishnu Smriti inline with Vishnu and Smriti. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm not sure if the current title is mean't to be clearer but I do not recall some of these letters being in the English alphabet, maybe IPA but definitely not English. The current title can act as a redirect. 212.113.145.253 (talk) 03:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.