Talk:Woohoo (Christina Aguilera song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

===GA pass=== After reviewing the article, I am passing it because it does meet the good article criteria. However, if you find any images for this article, please add them to enhance the article. Other than that, it looks great. Good work. Rp0211 (talk) 02:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This Article is in no way ready to be a GA. I will conduct a new review. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me

Issues (Active)
Other:
  • Dab links. Please see here for how to correct.


References:

  • Please do through each ref and make sure they all follow YYYY-MM-DD
  • ref [1] → Remove italics in name, needs to be reformatted. work=Digital Spy publisher= Hachette Filipacchi UK
  • ref [3] → Remove italics
  • ref [4] → work=MTV News, publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom)
  • ref [5] → work=Digital Spy publisher= Hachette Filipacchi UK ...... no italics.
  • ref [9] → work=AOL Radio publisher= AOL Inc
  • ref [11] → publisher= NOW Communications Inc and remove italics
  • ref [12] → work = Guardian.co.uk publisher = Guardian News
  • ref [13] → publisher = Rovi Corporation .... remove all italics
  • ref [17] → Remove italics
  • ref [18] → Remove italics
  • ref [20] → work=MTV News, publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom)
  • ref [23] → Remove " "
  • ref [26] → publisher= Apple Inc
Prose (Not Complete)
Prose:
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me
I take it that becuase the article is listed as "the second single", when really it was just sent to radio, is the reason why it didn't meet criteria? Becuase to me, the only source in the article stating that this is her second single has expired. The iTunes lik DOES NOT confirm that WooHoo was released as a digital download single at all.--Apeaboutsims (talk) 04:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment The article would benefit from converting a big chunk of the many quotes into reformulations, to avoid problems with copyright and make sure it's not just a transcript. Additionally, wikilinks in quotations are deprecated by MOS:QUOTE. These two things should be fixed before promotion is considered. Hekerui (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New review by Aiken ♫ 14:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Composition
  • Prose is ok but I feel this section is lacking. Was it Aguilera who wrote it? Music too? What about the musical structure? What key is it in? What instruments are used? How did Aguilera come up with it? And so on.
  • "It has been called a... compared to..." By whom?
  • Nothing is mentioned about Minaj and how she features.
Critical reception
  • "The Daily Star compared the song to Kelis and M.I.A." How could a song be compared to an artist?
  • 'Rob Harvilla of The Village Voice called the song a cool "schoolyard stomp"' - is 'cool' meant to be part of the quote?
  • Chockablocked full of quotes, that don't seem to have any connection or relation to one another.
General
  • Song names should be in double quotes. Publications should be italicized. Make sure they all are.
References
  • Ref #8 needs to be converted to lowercase.
Disambiguations
  • Please see list and fix.
Images
  • None at all? Not even one of Aguilera?

These are my points. I'll also be considering the points left by others before I can consider promoting this. On hold. Aiken ♫ 14:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent effort has been made in the past week to improve this, so unfortunately I have no choice but to fail this. Aiken Drum 15:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Woohoo_(Christina_Aguilera_song)/GA1&oldid=1051776385"