A fact from 2012 World Bank Group presidential election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
TRhe lack of Kim's engagement especially with a failed RSVP to the CGD/Washington Post event.Phd8511 (talk) 00:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what youre talking about. But if you have a cite add it.Lihaas (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure? That means you basically edit without knowledge of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phd8511 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Or you can spell out what the heck youre rambling about so as to becomprehensible. And it would help if you dint NPA and sign your postsLihaas (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This does not add the term "meritocracy" into the quote, however both other candidates have mentined that it is not on a merit-bbasis, in fact Ocampo was explicit in saying so. With that ihn mind, the mention and wikilink is appropriate. Alternatively we could move the link but in this location the "quota" bit is clarly (and always) in opposition to a meritocracy.(Lihaas (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)).[reply]
In the infobox both candidates and the incumbent are listed as Independents. As party politics isn't really a factor in this arena, I suggest we remove these labels. --LukeSurltc 20:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some of us have tried to do this, but when the party labels are dropped some quirk in the software causes the photos to disappear. If you can work out how to cut out the irrelevant party labels and retain the photos, you will deserve applause! Nandt1 (talk) 00:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid it's beyond me too! --LukeSurltc 23:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
