Talk:Wu-style tai chi
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wu-style tai chi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of Wikipedians by martial art add yourself!
[edit]Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_martial_art
What about adding a bit about the son of Ma Yueh Liang and Wu Ying Hua the article refers to? He lives in the Netherlands and teaches in Europe, his name is Ma Jiang Bao. --Lx 30 June 2005 23:57 (UTC)
On Jul 24, 2005 I added an external link to the Ann Arbor Wu Style Academy, but it was removed on July 26. Why was the link removed? (I have readded the link.) --Shekkara 26 July 2005 21:05 EDT
- It was removed because the Ann Arbor school is already included in the certified training centres listings in the link to the main Federation website, www.wustyle.com. Why have two links? Fire Star 05:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Then by the same reasoning the Shanghai listing should be removed too. Shekkara Thu Jul 28 07:31:59 EDT 2005
On Nov 6, 2005 I added a link to SanDiegoTaiChi.com. On it I maintain a list of all Wu Style related websites (including the three others currently listed). I would like to expand and maintain this as a resource for the Wu Style community. If you know of any other Wu Style websites, please contact me through my site.
What about adding a bit about the adopted Daughter of Ma Yueh Liang and Wu Ying Hua the article refers to? She lives in New Zealand and teaches Wu Style Tai Chi there, in the United States and Europe. Her name is Shi Mei Lin, and Wu Ying Hua and Ma Yueh Liang named her Wu Yan Tang. Zhongdian (talk) 23:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Also added a reference to the Shanghai Chien Chuan association and that Ma Hai Long, son of Wu Ying Hua and Ma Yueh Liang is the current head there and still teaching Tai Chi. Zhongdian (talk) 04:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Move to "Wu-style t'ai chi ch'uan"
[edit]It has been discussed at length here: Talk:T'ai chi ch'uan#Romanization / Naming Revisited. Unfortunately the consensus was not reached to move to pinyin (taijiquan), as most other Chinese martial arts have done. This is because although most well learned practitioners and professionals of the martial art refer to it in the pinyin form, the majority of references to it are still in the Wade-Giles form. Consensus was thus reached to at least use the accurate Wade-Giles form, if at all, since the spelling "tai chi chuan" is too ambiguous as in turn one could, for example, also write "chi" (for "qi") instead of "ch'i", and making it appear to be the "chi" in the name (tai chi chuan), etc. This consensus has allowed for correctness while following WP guidelines of adopting the most common usage.
In turn, in all related articles it's to be made immediately clear that "t'ai chi ch'uan" is interchangeable with "taijiquan", e.g. writing "t'ai chi ch'uan (taijiquan)" or "taijiquan (t'ai chi ch'uan"), while on the t'ai chi ch'uan page, a write-up is going to be made to reflect that officially, taijiquan is preferred. For the sake of avoiding unnecessary fragmentation, all the family styles are being renamed to "t'ai chi ch'uan" as well. The shift of common usage is slowing moving toward pinyin and in time the change will be made to it, but for now the current usage in it's correct form is what seems best to use and, of course, to avoid confusion through naming fragmentation, it's best to have all sub-pages in-line with the main t'ai chi ch'uan page. I hope this doesn't upset anyone and you all understand the necessity for the current position that has been taken. InferKNOX (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why the hyphenization of "Wu-style"? Nobeody does that, not in any publications, nor in any websites put up by Wu style teachers. Indeed, the only place that uses a hyphen is Wikipedia. It looks weird. 76.112.246.82 (talk)
- It was discussed at length in the link I mentioned. If using the Wade-Giles romanization, accurate spelling requires that the hyphens are present. A simple example that would help to explain this is that, according to the Wade-Giles romanization, the transliterations chi and ch'i mean two completely different things, that is, "ultimate" and "life energy" respectively. Common usage is according to Wade-Giles, however, it is often misspelled to a version omitting the hyphens. The closest that Wikipedia can get to displaying this common usage, whilst still being correct (spelling-wise) is to display it hyphenated. In the Pinyin, there are no hyphens, it is spelt taijiquan. This is currently not common usage, though, and thus can't be used on Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's common usage principles. I hope this clarifies the reasoning for you. ~ InferKNOX (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry I was at a complete tangent (thinking apostrophe). Hyphens are used on all the family-style article pages on Wikipedia, as it is proper English punctuation. ~ InferKNOX (talk) 00:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- It was discussed at length in the link I mentioned. If using the Wade-Giles romanization, accurate spelling requires that the hyphens are present. A simple example that would help to explain this is that, according to the Wade-Giles romanization, the transliterations chi and ch'i mean two completely different things, that is, "ultimate" and "life energy" respectively. Common usage is according to Wade-Giles, however, it is often misspelled to a version omitting the hyphens. The closest that Wikipedia can get to displaying this common usage, whilst still being correct (spelling-wise) is to display it hyphenated. In the Pinyin, there are no hyphens, it is spelt taijiquan. This is currently not common usage, though, and thus can't be used on Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's common usage principles. I hope this clarifies the reasoning for you. ~ InferKNOX (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Improving lineage trees
[edit]Wu-style tree
[edit]
Key: | NEIJIA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solid lines | Direct teacher-student. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dot lines | Partial influence /taught informally /limited time. | TAIJIQUAN | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dash lines | Individual(s) ommited. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dash cross | Branch continues. | CHEN-STYLE | Zhaobao-style | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YANG-STYLE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(王蘭亭) Wang Lanting 1840–? 2nd gen. Yang | (杨健侯) Yang Jianhou 1839–1917 2nd gen. Yang 2nd gen. Yangjia Michuan | (杨班侯) Yang Banhou 1837–1892 2nd gen. Yang 2nd gen. Guang Ping Yang Yang Small Frame | WU (HAO)-STYLE | Zhaobao He-style | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Li-style | (杨少侯) Yang Shaohou 1862–1930 3rd gen. Yang Yang Small Frame | (吴全佑) Wu Quanyou 1834–1902 1st gen. Wu | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(齊閣臣) Qi Gechen 2nd gen. Wu | (吴鉴泉) Wu Jianquan 1870–1942 2nd gen. Wu WU-STYLE 108 Form | (郭松亭) Guo Songting 2nd gen. Wu | (王茂齋) Wang Maozhai 1862–1940 2nd gen. Wu | SUN-STYLE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(董英杰) Dong Yingjie 1891–1960 4th gen. Yang | (鄭榮光) Zheng Rongguang 1903–1967 3rd gen. Wu | (马岳梁) Ma Yueliang 1901–1998 3rd gen. Wu | (吴英华) Wu Yinghua 1907–1997 3rd gen. Wu | (吴公儀) Wu Gongyi 1900–1970 3rd gen. Wu | (吴公藻) Wu Gongzao 1903–1983 3rd gen. Wu | (杨禹廷) Yang Yuting 1887–1982 3rd gen. Wu | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(鄭天熊) Cheng Tinhung 1930–2005 Wudang-style | Li Liqun 1924–Present 4th gen. Wu | (吴大揆) Wu Dakui 1923–1972 4th gen. Wu | (吴雁霞) Wu Yanxia 1930–2001 4th gen. Wu | (吴大新) Wu Daxin 1933–2005 4th gen. Wu | (王培生) Wang Peisheng 1919–2004 4th gen. Wu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(吴光宇) Wu Guangyu 1946–Present 5th gen. Wu | (骆舒焕) Luo Shuhuan 1935–1987 5th gen. Wu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHEN-STYLE | YANG-STYLE | WU-STYLE | SUN-STYLE | WU (HAO)-STYLE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm working hard on improving the lineage trees for the main taijiquan page and for all the family style pages. Please comment on the this tree where you feel improvements can be made and help me by posting information on individuals that aught to be included in the tree and the reason for their significance so that a detailed Wu-style tree can be produced. All individuals to be added that are approved upon (via consensus of course) will be added, unless they threaten to make the tree excessively large whilst adding little value to the overall tree.
The tree on the main page is to focus on the gate keepers of the styles in order to show each family style's lineage without making it excessively large, while the trees on the family style pages are to be more focused on the particular styles, showing a more in depth view of it's development & connection to other family styles. I hope to hear from as many of you as possible & will continue making edits to the tree here as feedback comes in. Thanks. InferKNOX (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Red
[edit]Why the red, bolded "invalid <ref> tag"s? In the thousands of wikipages I have perused, this is a first. Is it a new style, or am I all wet? rags (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Potential renaming under discussion
[edit]Editors interested in this topic are politely asked to participate in the discussion here: Talk:Tai chi#Consistency among Tai chi-related articles. SilverStar54 (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Seniority?
[edit]"...and fourth in terms of seniority." What does this mean please? It comes across as a subjective value judgement without a reference to who makes that judgement. Thanks Jeff. 213.31.102.201 (talk) 14:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seniority in terms of when the style was founded. First Chen, then Yang, then Wu (武), then Wu (吳), then Sun. I agree that sentence is not clear, and could be taken the wrong way. Perhaps "the fourth oldest of the five major styles"? There is a similar sentence in the third paragraph of the Wu (Hao)-style article. Jōkepedia (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I definitely think that would be better. It's clearer and less 'loaded'. Thanks for help. Jeff 213.31.102.201 (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Having received no other comments, I've gone ahead and made the change. Glad to help. Jōkepedia (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I definitely think that would be better. It's clearer and less 'loaded'. Thanks for help. Jeff 213.31.102.201 (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)