Jump to content

Talk:XLR-11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:XLR-11 (drug))

Renaming article to 5F-UR-144?

[edit]

This chemical is rarely referred to as "XLR-11" by both users and researchers; according to Google 5F-UR-144 is used 8-10x more often in searches than XLR-11 (which also is the name of a motor, IIRC). I suspect the ratio would be much higher if XLR-11's numbers weren't boosted by the fact it shares its name with an established product talked about by car enthusiasts.

Perhaps it is better if this article was renamed to 5F-UR-144; there is no ambiguity of its meaning, unlike XLR-11.

Balst32 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XLR-11 (drug). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]