Jump to content

Talk:Zombivli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Zombivili)
Former good article nomineeZombivli was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 7, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
July 31, 2023Good article nomineeNot listed
May 19, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title Name

[edit]

Srimant_ROSHAN Sir Its titel has been create by wrong name. The original title belongs to Zombivli [1].

Bovineboy2008 Sir, attention to this articles. Cinzia007 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected the page named Zombivali to Zombivli.Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😊 Cinzia007 (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs major cleanup - who wants to help

[edit]

Lot of grammar errors, some areas with no information, very few citations

~~Cattywampus23

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Zombivli (2022 film)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 14:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 1 (It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria). The current version is rather barebones (WP:GACR 3a: it addresses the main aspects of the topic), but more obviously it is in need of a thorough copyediting (WP:GACR 1a: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct). Examples include But Dombivli, which, like Mumbai, still had a high case count therefore team searched for a place where the cases of COVID-19 is low in number. and Except for a few top-angle and exterior shots are filmed in Dombivli and 90% of the film has been shot in Latur. TompaDompa (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Zombivli/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Srimant ROSHAN (talk · contribs) 09:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Sadly, this is another WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 1, as the issues of the previous review have not been addressed. The article is far from being [b]road in its coverage, with the "Production" and "Release" sections being lacking in content. More importantly, the prose issues are still present, with grammatically incorrect and hard-to-parse sentences such as But Dombivli, still had a high case count. Therefore Latur which was low on the list of COVID-19 positive patients. and Except for a few top-angle and exterior shots, they were filmed in Dombivli, and 90% of the film was shot in Latur., which means the article is still a long way from meeting WP:GACR 1a (the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.