Talk:Zwoliński

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zwolinski → Zwoliński – Uncontroversial page move. This is the correct spelling of this Polish surname. Hoops gza (talk) 05:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not just a Polish surname (at least, anymore). I doubt the Canadian person on the dab page with the surname uses the ń. Dekimasuよ! 09:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - uncontroversial; all WP Anthroponymy articles follow the base orthography, despite that every Polish, German, whatever surname has a few emigrants in English speaking countries. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support: This kind of diacritics correction is routine, and can be done through the non-controversial technical moves process at RM, by the way. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 23:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.