Template talk:Kansas City Chiefs starting quarterback navbox

This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League

Kansas City Chiefs (inactive)

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City Chiefs, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kansas City ChiefsWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas City ChiefsTemplate:WikiProject Kansas City ChiefsKansas City Chiefs

Kansas City

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City

Missouri

This template is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri

Order in template

I don't know how other "starting quarterback" templates do it, but shouldn't these be in chronological, rather than alphabetical, order? Most other templates of this type that I've seen, like for governors, senators, etc., all seem to be in chronological order. — Bellhalla (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's how I've seen most starting QB templates too.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This should definetly be in chronological order. It makes no sense to do it any other way. Somebody must know the order. Gerry D (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]