Template talk:Nuclides

Please report any errors here[edit]

What happened to fermium and above?
Lanthanum-138 (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about the stability of EE82Pb204?
WFPM (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It agrees with http://www.frankswebspace.org.uk/ScienceAndMaths/physics/physicsGCE/images/N-ZgraphHalflives.gif.

The alpha decays I got from http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reColor.jsp?newColor=dm.

Just granpa (talk) 12:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I just noticed that 82Pb only showed 3 stable elements, evidently 206, 207, and 208, and must have left out 204. Suggest checking with CRC handbook data.

WFPM (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reColor.jsp?newColor=t12 204 undergoes alpha decay with a half life greater than 10^15 seconds.

WolframAlpha agrees. http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/isotopes/lead_204/2y/re/x8/

Just granpa (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1.4 X 10E^17 years Wow!! that's a lot of seconds, And my 2006-2007 CRC doesn't show that. Does show EE82Pb 208 @ 2 X 10E^19 years with sf, which you call stable. Discover any interest in your nuclide charts?WFPM (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]