Jump to content

User talk:AlaskaLava

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:AbwaanRooble)


Welcome to my talk page I am AlaskaLava

[edit]
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, AlaskaLava, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bro I want ask you one thing 192.145.170.73 (talk) 23:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flag vandal

[edit]

This guy shows up periodically and adds random, unrelated flags to articles. Gets blocked, and returns again. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts

[edit]

Hello! As someone who is knowledgeable on Somali history and clan politics, I am interested in hearing your thoughts on this discussion: [1]. AcidSnow (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, sounds interesting I will be looking into it, thank you - AlaskaLava 16 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Ughaz 'Elmi Warfa) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Ughaz 'Elmi Warfa, AlaskaLava!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be great if you could add individual page numbers to each reference.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Abdirahman Haji Aden Ibbi

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. AlaskaLava, thanks for creating Abdirahman Haji Aden Ibbi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add WP:RELIABLESOURCES

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, AlaskaLava. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Merca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Null (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yusuf ibn Tashfin; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TheseusHeLl (talk) 23:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hawiye

[edit]

Hey, i have spent quite a bit of time editing the Hawiye page with appropriate sources, why did you edit and change this? Abshir55 (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Olol Dinle is Ajuran and Barsane is Gaaljecel, just like Ali Jimale Ahmed outlines in his book, those 2 clans do not genealogically descend from the Hawiye. Especially Imam Ahmed there is absolutely no scholar mentioning Imam Ahmed being Hawiye. Cheers --AlaskaLava (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring warning #1

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Degodia

[edit]

I want ask you something about this page please respond me quickly 192.145.170.73 (talk) 23:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Banadir coast

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AlaskaLava. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Banadir coast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Banadir coast

[edit]

Hello, AlaskaLava. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Banadir coast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Degodia

[edit]

Hello can I talk to you? Mohamed IT (talk) 01:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sultan Mahomed Haji Dideh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jacob300 (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sultan Mahomed Haji Dideh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is very unlikely to meet notability requirements. A google books search only shows one publication that mentions Dideh in passing. The cited source states ""Sultan Mahomed Haji Dideh," I read, "was born at Zeila, and is not in a sound state of mind. He is under the delusion that he is king of all the kings. His dominions, he says, extend even beyond the limits of this earthly planet" - No mention of him being a prosperous merchant or constructing a mosque. Therefore, this page is likely to qualify for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jacob300 (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]