User talk:Frost

New page reviewer granted

Hi Frost, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External Links Issue

Hello Frost, thanks for your message. I understand the removal, but could you clarify which links were considered inappropriate? I’d appreciate any further guidance on the matter. Ghulamwork4 (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Ghulamwork4. There are two issues with your edit: the link and the name. External links are not normally added to disambiguation pages and the link you added is nothing more than the base URL of a website, suggesting it isn't relevant to the topic and might be promotional, which isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. To add an entry in a disambiguation page, it should link to at least one article, and it shouldn't be worded promotionally like "SEO expert", except when supported by reliable sources. Please ask at the teahouse if you have more questions. Frost 03:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent dispute

Tumhare Hisaab Se Jo hua Woh Theek Hai Ya nahin to mujhe batao ki Kya Main Sharma Se Apne Kaam Se Matra rakhna Par tum Bina Malo Mere Mehta एक्सप्लेन में or i will accuse on my deathnote Sir Ranvijay Ghera (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? Please write in English. Frost 09:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, they are abusing proxies now. [1] - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Star anise

This move was done without any input from editors who are regulars of WP:Wikiproject Plants. With only two comments and very little time, the move is premature. Please move it back and request comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 11:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could relist the move discussion if there's a valid opposition. Do you have an argument for why the title should be the earlier one? Otherwise, the lack of participation from regulars isn't a good reason to undo it. Frost 12:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because the consensus at Plants is always to go with the scientific name. Exceptions are only made for cases where there is some doubt about the correct scientific name. Abductive (reasoning) — Preceding undated comment added 00:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted. Frost 09:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]