User talk:Alumnum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

red-outlined triangle containing exclamation point I'm currently unable to access this account. Please message me on my alternative account Munmula instead.

Archive
Archives

Apocalyptic events[edit]

Hi there. I've reverted some of your edits to the List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events as they went against the consensus established at the FLC. Note that the first comment at the FLC was advising me that "Featured lists no longer begin with "this list..." nor make any references to the list as they are considered tautological." This is an accepted standard for list articles, though unfortunately many non-featured lists still contain language like this. I've also removed the image you added as placing an image there made the entire table skewed. I didn't think having the entire table shortened was worth the addition of the image, though we can discuss it on the talk page if you like. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 05:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I've restored some of those edits, but this time with a justification in the talk page. - Alumnum (talk) 13:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alumnum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:We from Pitcairn Island.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fermi paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life on Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matriarchy article[edit]

Stop WP:Edit warring. Discuss at Talk:Matriarchy. And "discuss" obviously does not mean "post on the talk page and then re-add the disputed material." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I will start a discussion later. Sorry for the inconvenience. - Alumnum (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of constructed languages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cebuano and Andrew Smith
Harry Potter influences and analogues (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to King's Cross station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sergio Canavero.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sergio Canavero.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suzano massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Focus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HappyBirthdaySidna for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HappyBirthdaySidna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HappyBirthdaySidna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS discretionary sanctions[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HappyBirthdaySidna.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HappyBirthdaySidna.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Youth Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vraca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology for "alumnus/a/um"?[edit]

I note that the etymology in Wiktionary on "alumnus" disagrees with your version of "unenlightened" – I am not going to fling a "[citation needed]" at a user page, but do you have one? Moreover, to mix the Etymology 5 (Ancient Greek) of "a-" with Latin "lumen" sounds like a dubious heterolingualism (or alteroglossality)! PJTraill (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. I honestly believed in this folk etymology of alumnum all this time since a primary teacher of mine once said that it used to be a pejorative term because it means "without light". It made sense to me since the Greek morpheme a- represents a negation and lumnus did sound like "light", so I never looked it up. I think I should have asked this teacher where she got this from. The more I live, the more I see how unenlightened I am! - Alumnum (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epiousios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frisian language and Ido (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Japanese Brazilians[edit]

Hello, Alumnum,

Thanks for creating List of Japanese Brazilians! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of Japanese and Korean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middle Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of films with post-credit scenes[edit]

Hello, Alumnum,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bilorv and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of films with post-credit scenes should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with post-credit scenes .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bilorv}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Newton Ishii.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newton Ishii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Behind Closed Doors (anime) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a hentai, RS not found that could meet WP:GNG and Daisuke Ono's article makes no mention of this anime

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ミラP 15:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Identical case for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Identical case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identical case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 11:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Country Mouse and the City Mouse Adventures characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Country Mouse and the City Mouse Adventures characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Artem.G (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of films with post-credits scenes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with post-credits scenes. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —S Marshall T/C 08:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of films with post-credits scenes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films with post-credits scenes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with post-credits scenes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

S Marshall T/C 17:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Creativerse for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creativerse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creativerse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietCicada (talk) 22:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Formal case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this term is used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]