Jump to content

User talk:Jhyunxtina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Bae, Kim & Lee)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bae, Kim & Lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bae, Kim & Lee, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KH-1 (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bae, Kim & Lee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I clearly understand the reason I have been blocked. I intend to edit the page and remove all promotional and advertising information in accordance with the policies of Wikipedia. Please unblock my account so that I can make these changes and conform to the guidelines provided by Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You obviously don't as you haven't picked a new username. You also haven't addressed your violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Yamla (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Apologies for my mistake. I would like to change the name to BKL prteam as I would like to create a page for BKL, the company I work for, on behalf of the PR team. My email address is [redacted] so please feel free to email me for any clarification. Now that I have changed the username and carefully read the guide to conflict of interest and paid editing, I intend to include the paid contributor template on the talk page and disclose that I am an employee at BKL, as well as getting rid of promotional materials such as recogntions & awards. Other information, such as practice areas and offices, is obviously just simple facts. I hope this clarifies everything and hope you will reconsider your decision.

Decline reason:

First, your username is an absolute violation of WP:Username policy: it would be representing the PR team of a company. Second, it doesn't appear that you understand what makes material have a promotional tone. For both of those reasons, I am declining your request to have your account unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 02:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am quite confused, because a user left a comment before you reviewed my username and said that if it is clear that I am part of the group (pr team,in this case), I can change the username to BKL prteam. Also, based on the policies that I have reviewed, it says if I am a paid contributor which includes employees writing for their companies, I can upload materials by clearly indicating that I am one by using the paid contributor template. I also intend to edit the material so that it does not have a promotional tone. If this does not suffice, then how can I can be unblocked and create a neutral, unbiased page for our company?

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. MER-C 04:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • You have changed your username from 'Bae, Kim & Lee' to 'Jhyunxtina'. Therefore you can't change it again, without good reason, for 2 years. In any case 'BKL prteam' clearly represents a group rather than a single person and is unacceptable. Finally, please do not delete this comment, again, until you are unblocked because it is disruptive to the unblock review process. Just Chilling (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What I am asking is not how I can change the username. My question is, how I can be unblocked in order that I can edit the company page so that it has a neutral, unbiased tone based on facts and news articles - contents like the number of employees, location of our overseas offices, and our practice areas. If I am blocked because I work for a company, then please advise how I can create a company page.

Decline reason:

You don't. Your appeals to date, and your nomination of "BKL prteam" as a replacement username clearly indicates you aren't here to contribute to the broader encyclopedia. As such, your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 04:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Bae, Kim & Lee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other account[edit]

Other account, now blocked: User:Xovuddid. Please read WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you may now know, your talk page access has been revoked. If you wish to appeal this block, first read Wikipedia:Appealing a block, then visit the unblock requests system (UTRS). Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19068 was submitted on Aug 25, 2017 00:31:54. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 00:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jhyunxtina (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19069 was submitted on Aug 25, 2017 02:31:10. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 02:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]