User talk:Vanished user 90345uifj983j4toi234k/Archive 3

The following messages were sent to me in the past by other users. Please do not modify them.

Thank you

Hello Brendenhull

I appriciate your efforts to prevent vandalism... I am still new at this and I continue to forget to log on... Thank you again for being a great Wikipedia neighbour. Julie :)

Hi, hope your OK. I updated a page on Imperial and Royal Highness to show a third use of this title, but you have deleted this thinking it a test. The info added was accurate (although maybe a bit longwinded!!) so trust you will change back! Thanks, Seb.

Vandalproof edit summary

Hi Brenden,

Your edit summary for a reversion in a sandbox had "Revert to revision by Sandbot using VandalProof". While you sent a welcoming message to the IP, talking about reverting within the sandbox may be a little confusing to some. Thanks, Andjam 10:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

thanks...sorry, i wasn't aware that there was a sandbox.

Slut page

Hello Brendon,

Its good to know your out there keeping an eye out for vandals on the slut page.

I dont know why my entry was deleted. Was not a test.

Sluts are only explained on the page as either socially unacceptable in contempory society, or acceptably among polyamorous or homosexual sub-cultures. However the fact is that many males and some females dont see a slut as derogatory but as a source for easy sex and pleasure. I think it needs to be explained that sluts are not always frowned upon and even appreciated and respected in some circles and sub cultures. Lets face it. Many men like to have easy access to SLUTS. Im just saying this whole idea that someone would like sluts is ommitted from the article.

tfd

can you tfd this redundant orphan? Template:Republic of China infobox kthxbye SchmuckyTheCat 21:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA

You appear to be attempting to do this manually, and it's not formatting correctly. Please delete Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Brendenhull and start over again at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate. RadioKirk talk to me 22:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism? Moi?

Hi, I was unaware that deleting content was considered vandalism. I was merely removing what was less fact than a fan's opinion. I also removed a section that claimed a guitar was out of tune on a song, because I could find no sources for it online, and I listened to the song and the guitar sounds in tune to me (I am a musician). The guitarist is using bends, which someone with no idea about playing guitar might perceive to be an out-of-tune guitar (if I am mistaken and the guitar is actually out of tune, forgive me). Is it not okay to remove false information?216.249.145.234 19:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I can only assume that you were mistaken in calling my actions vandalism, as what I did was to clean up the article and remove false information. If I don't get a reply from you within a couple of days, I will go back and remove those parts again. Again, no offense, but I can only think that you must be mistaken.216.249.145.234 06:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Alright... I'm going to go back and remove the false information and the part that was basically fan review. I can't imagine that it would be against the rules to delete false content. If you can find the rule that says it's vandalism to delete something that's not true, I'd be interested to see it. And if I'm wrong, apologies, but seriously... how can deleting a lie be against the rules?216.249.145.234 19:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox Header

I'm sorry if you've misunderstood, but I did not remove content. I was only modifying the Sandbox heading so that it will only appear on Wikipedia:Sandbox. The reason for that is to prevent testers from accidentally/purposefully modifying the header for testing reasons.—G.He 23:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please visit this link. You will see that the contents are still there as you scroll down.—G.He 23:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Just a side note: When posting warnings, add subst: in front of the warning to substitute the message (See Template:TestTemplates for details). Also, you should use the -n version to further name the specified page. Good luck with patrolling!—G.He 23:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Joseph Stalin

Where is your evidence that Mr. Stalin wrote his name Josef? He probably didn't even use Romanized characters! Most sources accept it as Joseph. 204.9.144.52 14:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Recent blocking of 212.219.82.37

Sorry, that was me doing a test to see if our IP was unblocked. Sorry for the trouble, please unblock us Mollsmolyneux 11:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Atlus page edit?

As Trauma Center Wii has been officially announced as being subtitled 'Second Opinion', I changed the name of the game on the Atlus page, but it was edited back by you. Proof of the game can be found here:

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/puzzle/traumacentersecondopinion/index.html?q=trauma%20center

I'll change the page back to my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.107.150 (talk • contribs)

The above messages were sent to me in the past by other users. Please do not modify them.