User talk:DivyaDilip

February 2024

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nikhil Siddhartha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 00:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DivyaDilip! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Nikhil Siddhartha several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Nikhil Siddhartha, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 20:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Siddhartha appearance in Jayam?

Hello, DivyaDilip. You have new messages at Talk:Nikhil_Siddhartha#Appearance_in_Jayam?.
Message added 20:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Archer1234 (t·c) 20:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DivyaDilip. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Dilip Kumar Salvadi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kalyankokila per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kalyankokila. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]