User talk:E.M.Gregory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the Wikipedia encyclopedia article, see Reader.
It is The Reader that we should consider on every edit we make to Wikipedia.

(Thanks to Alan Liefting)‎

Michael Wolf (Businessman) Page removal[edit]

Hi I created the Michael Wolf page many years ago along with many other articles on other CEO's, celebrities, and historical figures that I was familiar with. I used information that was available on the Internet to provide information on these figures and personal knowledge to create articles. I had not updated the Michael Wolf page for a while, and it was created to provide information on a known CEO that is researched by others on a regular basis. He regularly gives speeches to the media on media trends, attends Davos, and is the CEO of Activate.com. Wikipedia is a palace where people go to research current and past know figures, which is why I believe his page should remain active. I am willing to update it with current information and I am requesting that Michael Wolf's page be restored. It has been on Wikipedia for many, many years and is a part of Wikipedia's original article feeds / historical articles that help build Wikipedia.

Please let me know if you can assist with restoring the page and I will update it. Thank you. user:endicium m@endicium.com

Black star[edit]

hello friend i can bring you everything about black star.

when 17n was arrested, black star burned some cars, 3 or 4 times. here is the only text i could find1 actions 1 2. the organisation claimed that existed for above 4 years and did many actions...but the press didn't publiced..

i can find more 2 or 3 actions.Αντικαθεστωτικός (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Just FYI, your suggested page move request from 2015 has been closed this date as moved. Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  18:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi E.M.Gregory! You created a thread called external links to stuff page is sort of promoting at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


World Famous Kenton Club‎[edit]

Thanks for participating in the ongoing discussion. I found a couple more profiles in The Oregonian (the largest newspaper in Oregon and the second largest in the Pacific Northwest by circulation) and The Portland Tribune, but I'm currently scrambling to save a few other articles nominated by the same editor. I won't be surprised if the article is deleted, so I may just have to work in the draft space after deletion since I don't have time to rescue and expand immediately. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, unrelated, if an AfD nominator changes their own vote to redirect, does that mean the AfD should be closed? Just curious. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure, User:Another Believer. I do know that if a Nom changes to "keep", he can only close the page if there are no "delete" votes. So I suspect that Nom could only close the page if thre are no outstanding keep or delete votes.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Hello E.M.Gregory,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV-pushing and slander accusations[edit]

Since you must know that these accusations are serious charges, I need not to explain. This is also construable as skirting on your previous topic ban where you were sanctioned for POV pushing on immigration topics, so you must be mindful. If you are confident in your accusation and evidence, you must report me on the Incidents noticeboard. Otherwise, please cease these accusations. Thank you. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 21:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • You should certainly stop accusing fellow editors of being "NAZIS".E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was nowhere an accusation of being Nazis, and repeatedly construing my citations to essays as advisements as such is disruptive and uncivil. If you want to continue this thread, WP:ANI is definitely a better venue. I will not comment further here. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 21:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Citing past diffs does not imply a challenge to consummated closures. Consider these edits by Tsumikiria:
- "can you provide diffs on EMG citing hate groups as sources? This is absolutely unacceptable. Under the advisements from WP:NONAZIS, this should warrant a block, at least" [1],
- "A long term or indef TBAN from BLP and American Politics may be in order, as illegal immigration isn't the only part of AP where they attempted POV editing. At this point it might be appropriate to cite WP:NORACISTS as well" [2]
Observe NORACISTS redirects to NONAZIS.
Cheers to all, XavierItzm (talk) 00:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Scottsdale spree shooting at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Freedom Caucus (DFC)[edit]

Update - among the References added since the discussion began about whether to keep or delete, one of the articles is a source documenting that a DFC state chair was elected to city council. Mab135ac (talk) 16:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Mab135ac[reply]

Here are some References I found related to the Democratic Freedom Caucus (DFC): - most recent article, February: https://medium.com/@phila_31297/meet-the-people-rescuing-american-politics-by-trying-to-capture-land-value-989f4d50b717 - article last year: https://www.progress.org/articles/electing-geoist-candidates-in-the-united-states - Daily Kos interview with a DFC member: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2005/9/23/151338/-? Also, one of the other editors cited the Kos encyclopedia full entry about the DFC: http://www.dkosopedia.com/static/d/e/m/Democratic_Freedom_Caucus_f8c6.html - article in Groundswell newsletter: http://commonground-usa.net/stoner-nadine_democratic-freedom-caucus-endorses-lvt-2009.htm - critique of DFC by some libertarians: http://libertarianmajority.net/democratic-freedom-caucus-redacted-platform Mab135ac (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Mab135ac[reply]

Access to source?[edit]

Hello, I'd like to ask you for a favor. You seem to have access to some subscriptions. I was wondering if you might be able to access The wall street journal 24 June 1971 "why not explode it in the geographic center of the United States in central Kansas?" This is a quotation from a WSJ article whose title is not referenced, but that is related to US Atomic Energy Commission hearings, to that year's underground test in Amchitka Alaska, to Patrick Moore the author the quote, or to the Don't Make A Wave Committee which Moore was representing. Barring error, certainly there is an article containing this quote on that issue; I'd be interested in any appearance of Moore there. If you don't have this sort of access, never mind, and thank you anyway for all do you here at Wikipedia. It's evidently a thankless job. XavierItzm (talk) 00:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:XavierItzm Blasting the Blast: AEC's Plan to Stage Atom Test in Alaska Brings Sharp Dissent Critics Fear Quakes, Waves, Harm to U.S.-Soviet Ties; No Danger Seen by Agency But Is This Test Necessary? Blasting the Blast: AEC's Plan for Test Brings Sharp Dissent

By JAMES E. BYLIN Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Wall Street Journal (1923 - Current file); New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]24 June 1971: 1. Proquest url: [3]. The final sentence of the article is the sole mention I see of Moore, it reads: "Patrick Moore, a Canadian conservationist, points out that Japan, Canada and even the soviet Union (which is 800 miles form Amchitka) are closer to the blast site than is the contiguous U.S. and thus 'exposed to a more serious threat.' His suggestion, if the U.S. wants 'to indulge" itself in the test explode it in the geographic center of the United States in central Kansas." - note that only two phrases are direct quotes of Moore. E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am indebted to you. Is it possible for you to clarify if the title is
Blasting the Blast: AEC's Plan to Stage Atom Test in Alaska Brings Sharp Dissent Critics Fear Quakes, Waves, Harm to U.S.-Soviet Ties; No Danger Seen by Agency But Is This Test Necessary?
or
Blasting the Blast: AEC's Plan for Test Brings Sharp Dissent
Many thanks again, XavierItzm (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:XavierItzm, in screen shot of article as printed, The article is headlined in four chunks, each part is underlined to separate it form the next:
  • Blasting the Blast: AEC's Plan to Stage Atom Test in Alaska Brings Sharp Dissent
  • Critics Fear Quakes, Waves, Harm to U.S.-Soviet Ties
  • No Danger Seen by Agency
  • But Is This Test Necessary?
  • Hope that helps.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That was fabulous. Again, many thanks, I very much appreciate it. XavierItzm (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have a gander at entry #2. Then at this. And finally at the rationale here. I make no assertions. XavierItzm (talk) 15:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vote Trump Church Burning Race Hoax[edit]

see Portal:Current events/2016 November 1 this entry should turn into an article: The predominantly African American Hopewell Missionary Baptist Church in Greenville Mississippi burned down to brick walls and spray painted with "Vote Trump" in what appeared to be a political hate crime. Andrew McClinton, a black member of the church was arrested, charged and later pleaded guilty to burning the church in a race hoax (WREG) Bachcell (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iain Overton[edit]

Following reading a review of his book in the Sunday Times, I made some changes to his page and deleted sentences that seemed to be 'advertising'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:103C:F0D4:49D5:46D3:3BAE:515D (talk) 22:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am I an "irresponsible article creator"?[edit]

You sound a sensible Wikipedian.
Re this within Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Wall (priest), which I didn't see until today.

"This article creator has indeed irresponsibly started literally thousands of clergy sub-stubs like this one " User:Reywas92

Everything I do is in good faith, and would never myself use such emotive language as this.

What do you think? Bashereyre Bashereyre (talk) 14:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have only met Reywas92 on Christianity-related pages. On this topic, he has a WP:BATTLEGROUND attitude, fails to check facts, makes false assertions, uses intemperate language, and is disrespectful towards fellow editors.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks on churches in France[edit]

Snopes has article debunking claims there is a recent wave of attacks against churches in France. There does not appear to be an article or even category, Persecution of Christians makes no mention of attacks on churches in France or the US. Many attacks on Churches in the US Sutherland Springs church shooting look like domestic violence incidents but are still attacks on churches. Category:Violence against Muslims shows a lot of related categories and articles Bachcell (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Bliss for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Bliss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bliss (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TSventon (talk) 16:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation?[edit]

Unless I'm mistaken, you appear to have been "indefinitely topic banned from pages and content related to illegal immigration, immigration policy, and the relationship between crime and immigration."[4] This edit[5] could be construed as a violation of that. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mea culpa. The act of adding new academic books to relevant pages is a longstanding habit of mine, my sincere apologies for making the encyclopedia better by adding a book to a page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Meighen[edit]

Hello, I read your comments on the article. I tried to improve the article - perhaps take a look, and consider voting. Cheers Lubbad85 (☎) 21:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russell Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Escondido Orthodox Presbyterian Church for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Escondido Orthodox Presbyterian Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escondido Orthodox Presbyterian Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gadeer Mreeh[edit]

On 5 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gadeer Mreeh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that newly-elected parliamentarian Gadeer Mreeh will be the first Druze woman to serve as a member of the Israeli Knesset? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gadeer Mreeh), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page indentation[edit]

You've made good posts and sound arguments on talk pages and AfDs, but I've noticed you often indenting discussions incorrectly. I'd like to leave you a link to a discussion I've started at WT:TPG#Reformatting talk page lists about proper indentation practices and why they're important. —⁠烏⁠Γ (kaw) │ 01:16, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Boundless Immigration[edit]

Hello User:E.M.Gregory, I am reaching out to you and several other experienced editors with a history of editing immigration topics. I would like to ask for your help with a new article that I and others have been working on: Draft:Boundless Immigration. I am in a fully disclosed COI position on the article and do not wish to get unduly involved in editing it further or, of course, in the decision about whether it should be moved from draft status to a live article. The draft has an unusual history. As far as I can tell, the editor who declined it in December 2018 (User:JC7V7DC5768) was relatively new to editing and was subsequently blocked indefinitely for a variety of reasons. User:Robert McClenon declined the article in April 2018, and has stated in several places that he does not get involved in new article decisions once he has weighed in. The third editor to work on it, User:Libracarol, improved it and was in favor of advancing the article before it was declined by the now-banned editor. But Libracarol has done no editing since February 2019 and has not responded to notes left on his/her talk page. Meanwhile, the article (still in draft form) has nearly 30 solid references, which suggests that the topic is notable. Would you be willing to take a look at it and offer an opinion? Others who declined it did not have extensive immigration article editing histories, and that seems to be an important factor here. Many thanks in advance for considering my request! Messier6 (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Smelcer[edit]

Just wanted to say "thanks" for the edits you've been doing on that page. Nice work.Vizjim (talk) 14:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Qumisyeh[edit]

You added a notability tag to Mazin Qumsiyeh. Can you elaborate on your disagreement with the existing independent sources that are more than trivial mentions? -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

Hello E.M.Gregory,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Trevor Maynard - poet[edit]

Sorry, I’ve not been keeping up on wiki and did not realise a discussion was in place. To answer the following; Trevor Maynard edits The Poetic Bond which has published eight anthologies containing the work of 230 poets, as well as having three collections of his own. The books are published by Willowdown Books which uses the Print on Demand services of Createspace and Lulu. This is not self publishing, it is Print on Demand which is being used by traditional and self-publishing authors. The reviews of plays are accurately sourced and linked to several other notable pages. Up until four years ago, this Trevor Maynard came first google search ahead of the Lloyds one. Google search now sees this Trevor Maynard returned as the second Trevor Maynard in the list. Therefore I belief this deletion is somewhat harsh and does not truly reflect the community spirit and dissemination of useful information that Wikipedia represents. I believe the article should be u deleted. PAS Peteralansoron (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open Doors[edit]

Please respond at Talk:Open Doors (charitible foundation)#Page move Obscurasky (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Harris (novelist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nigel Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Done.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shohret Hoshur[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shohret Hoshur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Viva Nicolás (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elephants[edit]

If I can find enough authors other than Bernstein (writing in The Nation) and Lasar (detailed, but involved enough that I'd like someone more neutral in addition) then I am considering writing about the elephant.

If you like churches, then Penrhiw Priory (AfD discussion) might be up your street. The subject is really the building, not the hotel.

Uncle G (talk) 10:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Uncle G I do see that the unsourced subhead Pacifica Foundation#Internal conflict, 1990s–2002 needs, well, sources, for a start. Untangling this mares nest of would be useful, because the page makes nothing clear: Did Pacifica decide to accept corporate sponsorships or not? You'll need access to a good news archive, where there is coverage like (Around the Dial; Turmoil Continues to Rock Pacifica Stations; Juan Gonzalez's on-air resignation over the direction of the network is only the latest volley in a bitter two-year dispute.: [Home Edition] Carney, Steve. Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif. [Los Angeles, Calif]09 Feb 2001: F24. ).E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And so it begins. Uncle G (talk) 23:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you![edit]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naomi Wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Foley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019[edit]

Hello E.M.Gregory,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Ngo[edit]

I've been writing the article Andy Ngo for some time now. I noticed you've been writing it so I published it, feel free to edit. wumbolo ^^^ 17:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unprincipled editing[edit]

Would you mind explaining why you removed a description of "conservative" (sourced to multiple RS) from the lede of Andy Ngo while a day earlier inserting a description sourced to one RS (that flies in the face of several other RS) to the lede of Bari Weiss? To me, this seems utterly shameless and unprincipled, and is an example of the kind of editing behavior that makes editing in American politics dysfunctional. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I object to reductive ledes, of the kind you are supporting in re: Ngo, that tag people with complex political views with simplistic, one word labels. The Bari Weis edit [6] reflected the complexity of Weiss's political views.

A star[edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I see your great contributions on afd. I wanted to recognize your hard work with a star. Lightburst (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second topic ban violation[edit]

You have violated your topic ban for the second time[7]. You are "indefinitely topic banned from pages and content related to illegal immigration, immigration policy, and the relationship between crime and immigration",[8] yet you just now edited the page for "an anti-illegal immigration activist group"[9]. You should self-revert. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • apologies for forgetting myself and adding a RS to the page; I have self-reverted. I was simply going down a list of pages at AfD, running a WP:BEFORE and beginning to add sources that I found. In-depth coverage of this group comes up in a proper search. My suggesiton was going to be MERGE to FAIR, on the grounds that while this outfit existed, and was covered in reliable media in depthe, this outfit didn't get much coverage and should therefore be merged or parent org. E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are you commenting on the AfD for that group even after you were made aware about your topic ban? You should self-revert that, as well. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I offered helpful information [10] - not an iVote - on the assumption that we are here to build an encyclopedia. I AGF and accept your assertion that this sort of comment is forbidden and revert. E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Ingram (writer/actor)[edit]

You said it much better than I did. Bravo. Onel5969 TT me 01:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Selby page deletion thread[edit]

Thanks for your comments on the page about me. Not sure why some of the other reviews like those from PoliceOne and Force Science didn't come up when you searched [1] but I appreciate it. I hope the page doesn't get deleted but if so I think you got there honestly. Please have a look at my comments and that of Peter Moskos from this morning when you consider the page. I saw your page of fixed profiles so if you can help fix the page rather than deleting it I'd be happy. There's a nice interview of me with Memisis law [2] from a couple of years ago as well.Nselby451 (talk) 10:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops[edit]

Sorry for the accidental rollback. I need to stop checking my watchlist on mobile platforms. --GouramiWatcherTalk 17:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Wiki Lei Barnstar
In appreciation of your encouragement of me as a new editor trying to improve articles which are brought to AfD! RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Zeppa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sault Ste. Marie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue barnstar![edit]

The Article Rescue Barnstar
This is long overdue for your discoveries that helped 2017 Schofield/Rothschild spree shooting avoid deletion. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 21:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Hills Books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And the cavalry comes riding up the hill![edit]

Very glad to have a veteran rescuer helping out with this sci-fi stuff. Nice source finds! Haukur (talk) 21:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jew with a coin has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, E.M.Gregory. Jew with a coin, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 10:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books[edit]

Do you know anyone who would be good for taking the cited reviews of the person's work and turning it into article content? Uncle G (talk) 12:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

other accounts[edit]

Do you use any other account to edit Wikipedia? nableezy - 18:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. I do, however, do most of my editing connected via dynamic IP addresses assigned by a large institution. And I edit, as you do, in on highly contested topics. E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please see here. nableezy - 16:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Tag SPA'[edit]

Per [11], I would suggest that it isn't remotely appropriate to tag an IP who reports an issue with blatant promotional editing in an article at WP:ANI as a 'SPA', just because they then agree with said article being nominated for deletion. Even more so when it is clearly done because said IP disagreed with your questionable grounds for opposing deletion. I suggest you self-revert, and leave it to the closer of the AFD discussion to decide who is entitled to comment. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 21:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Um, your 1st edit and half of your edits to date were about Thomas Salme, the AfD about the Salme page, and at a noticeboard discussion of that AfD. This is what an SPA is, an editor who has edited primarily on a single topic.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Um, no. A 'single-purpose account' belongs to someone who edits largely on a single subject. Not to someone who is clearly familiar with Wikipedia policy, and hadn't edited the article (or any article on a similar subject) before, but has been editing Wikipedia for years (longer than you have, it appears), with a dynamic IP. Hardly anyone had significantly edited the article before I saw it, other then the string of genuine single-purpose registered accounts responsible from the promotional fluff I reported at WP:ANI. I am clearly no more of a 'SPA' than you are, and I consider your attempts to suggest otherwise to be entirely contrary to the stated purposes of Wikipedia. And clearly detrimental to its proper functioning, if this is the sort of response an unregistered user gets for reporting a clearly-problematic article at WP:ANI. Again, I ask you to remove the inappropriate tagging of someone who disagrees with you in an AFD discussion. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • How, precisely, are other editors supposed to tell that you are someone who "has been editing Wikipedia for years (longer than you have, it appears), with a dynamic IP." as opposed to the SPA sort of IP?E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: scratch my last comment, per your response on the AFD page. Thanks for that. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thanks for the warm welcome!

Appleedits (talk) 12:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will be missed[edit]

Best, XavierItzm (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 California stabbing rampage for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 California stabbing rampage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 California stabbing rampage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nableezy - 02:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 02:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • hi Nableezy, Gregory was blocked prior to your notification so i dont see how they can contribute to the afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know that, the notification happens as a result of nominating an article for deletion using Twinkle. nableezy - 15:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
okay, thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Many thanks for the encouragement. Fullrabb (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Fullrabb[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Festivals disestablished in 2013[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Festivals disestablished in 2013 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Music festivals disestablished in 2017[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Music festivals disestablished in 2017 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mark E. Talisman[edit]

On 16 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark E. Talisman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that President Gerald Ford delayed the signing ceremony for the 1974 Jackson–Vanik amendment because Mark E. Talisman's wife was in labor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark E. Talisman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mark E. Talisman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Precious Legacy[edit]

On 29 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Precious Legacy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an exhibit of Czech Jewish art and ritual objects confiscated by the Nazis for a planned "Museum of the Extinct Race" was seen by more than half a million people on its U.S. tour? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Precious Legacy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jew with a coin[edit]

On 3 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jew with a coin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in some Polish homes, an image of a Jew holding a coin (example pictured, left) hangs to the left of the doorway, and is customarily turned upside down on the Sabbath so that good fortune may fall upon the household? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jew with a coin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jew with a coin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Hello E.M.Gregory,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yew Tree Manor for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yew Tree Manor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yew Tree Manor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uhooep (talk) 09:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers[edit]

Merry Christmas, E.M.Gregory!
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 19:14, 19 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabila El-Bassel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nabila El-Bassel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 California stabbing attacks for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 California stabbing attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 California stabbing attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 20:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 Democratic Socialists of America candidates election for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Democratic Socialists of America candidates election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Democratic Socialists of America candidates election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 17:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anti-Zionism on Campus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-Zionism on Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Zionism on Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ImTheIP (talk) 03:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arab rejectionism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arab rejectionism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab rejectionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pincrete (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Thirty-Year Genocide[edit]

On 7 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Thirty-Year Genocide, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 2019 book argues that the Armenian Genocide was part of a larger genocide which targeted all of the Christian minorities in the Ottoman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Thirty-Year Genocide. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Thirty-Year Genocide), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Rich for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Rich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Rich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ImTheIP (talk) 08:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Children's museums in the District of Columbia[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Children's museums in the District of Columbia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2002 Queens rape for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2002 Queens rape is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Queens rape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Hertneky for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Hertneky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Hertneky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ploni (talk) 02:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings associated with crimes has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Buildings associated with crimes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QueenofBithynia (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:ISIL terrorist incidents in Italy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:ISIL terrorist incidents in Italy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beni Gassenbauer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beni Gassenbauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beni Gassenbauer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century attacks on synagogues and Jewish communal organizations in the United States has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:21st-century attacks on synagogues and Jewish communal organizations in the United States has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Longhornsg (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Courageous Conservatives PAC[edit]

Notice

The article Courageous Conservatives PAC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost completely reliant on primary sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 01:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sam Kooiker[edit]

Notice

The article Sam Kooiker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 06:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=%22nick+selby%22+%22in+context%22+review&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
  2. ^ http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/cross-nick-selby-a-cop-at-the-crossroad-of-tech-and-reform/12530
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:E.M.Gregory&oldid=1213122465"