User talk:Jon.0

Hello, Jon.0! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Rochester, New York appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --JBC3 (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rochester, New York. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Such edits include: Monroe Community College is in the process of being gutted by the Republican county government.--JBC3 (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Rochester, New York. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --JBC3 (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the edits to Rochester, New York, although the content you added is probably factual, you need to cite your sources (WP:OR). Also, please integrate new content into the existing structure of the article, when possible, rather than adding an update to the end. TheFeds 07:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Rochester, New York has been reverted. While you are welcome to make constructive edits to the encyclopedia, ignoring Wikipedia policy will not be tolerated.

try to add reliable citations to factual statements
avoid adding controversial information without including citations
use the article talk page to discuss topics relevant to the article, not to rant about Wikipedia policy you disagree with or your views on the world
avoid unconstructive and point of view edits

Your edit: (Kodak has recently announced further cutbacks in its workforce; however, verifiable information concerning the precise number or percentage is banned from this site. Kodak remains a major employer of Rochesterians and is beneficial to the Rochester area, no matter what the facts are. Nothing concerning Kodak or Rochester ever changes, regardless of what the company itself or other sources may say on the matter. Do not believe your eyes and ears. Please refer to Wikipedia regarding any truth in the matter.) --JBC3 (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography[edit]

Say, this wouldn't happen to be an autobiography, would it? Powers ^T 13:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Emmanuel John Winner[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emmanuel John Winner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel John Winner. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ccwaters (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]