User talk:Gallaz63/Kendama

Peer Review

Hi Gallaz63,

I really like this article since it has a lot of information and break down to small section so that readers can easily follow.

Here is the link to my Peer Review page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gallaz63/Kendama/AyanoTanaka_Peer_Review AyanoTanaka (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-move Review

Hello Gallaz63, I looked over your history and see that you've done quite a bit to improve the article!

When ready, you can Begin moving your work to Wikipedia! Please review the detailed explanation of the process on our class wiki.

While you are good to go, here are a few suggestions that will really make your additions shine:

Use the short description template for your paragraph above the Table of Contents. Remember that this is the first thing anyone will read on the page, starting a paragraph with "Also" is probably not recommended.
Add some more entries in the "See also" section.
Try to find an infobox that is relevant, maybe something that has to do with games, sports, or toys.
Do a once over, cleaning up the formatting a bit and making sure not to leave "(CITATION???))" in the "Contemporary Culture" section.
Try to link to the relevant WikiProjects.
Review the WikiEdu Editing Guide and see if anything else stands out.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for becoming a Wikipedia contributor! 一 Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gallaz63 (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick followup

@Gallaz63: I made a few small edits to Kendama. Mostly just formatting fixes *you can look in the history) but you can probably improve on that kind of stuff there.

Mostly, I think you should remove that note on top that says that are not citations or reliable sources. You've added tons! You should go remove that! Thanks for all your hard work on this! —mako ๛ 05:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]