Jump to content

User talk:Davidjcmorris/Web 3.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was recovered and restored to my user workspace, after being deleted for the n'th time. There really is no appetite at the moment for a Web 3.0 article on Wikipedia, whatever the merits of it being a topic of interest in the press and industry at large.

My intention is to merge Web 3.0 and Web 1.0 into the same page as Web 2.0, which will also give opportunity to mention some of the other variations like Web 2.0.1 and even Web 0.0.

Hopefully in doing this, there can be a general clean-up of the jargon in Web 2.0 as well. Once I have formulated an approach to this I will post it in the discussion space for Web 2.0. My current thinking is to reduce what's there as a main topic with a few sub-sections - then spawn off some child pages on associated topics, such as one detailing all the controversy around the topic 9i.e. move the criticism off the main page, but with a bold link to it in the introduction).

I guess, eventually, if Web 3.0 becomes more than smoke and hyperbole (although many would say that this is a good definition of Web 2.0 as well), then it mioght warrant it's own page. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brainstorming[edit]

I'm brainstorming some resources and ways to give the Web 3.0 concept more solidity for a wikipedia article (see my user space). So every so often I might come over and edit this article. Making one article for Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Web 3.0 is a sound idea, but as it stands there is quite a lot of info on Web 2.0 and it might be confusing to lump them all together. Well, we'll see what happens I guess. --...but what do you think? ~B Fizz (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for preseverving the Web 3.0 article![edit]

Hi, I just want to say thanks for saving this article. I saw in the deletion logs that it was deleted on the grounds of (supposedly) being too much of undefinable prototypical invention right now, though I think that the removal of that article from Wikipedia (and the refusal of the Admins to incorporate it into the "Web 2.0" or "Semantic Web" articles) definitely slows the progress of Web 3.0's development, since there ARE Wikipedians who subscribe to the RSS feeds of articles that are of interest to them, and who I am sure were keeping track of the latest contributions, ideas, information--and the referenced articles and books--that were being put into the Web 3.0 article. So thank you for saving this "last" copy of it (for the time being)! Cheers!
68.174.102.95 (talk) 05:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for saving it. I find it simply astonishing that this article was deleted. Wjfox2005 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]