User talk:HJ Mitchell
|
This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.
TFA
[edit] | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you today for Wolverton Viaduct, introduced: "Wolverton Viaduct is (and this will shock you!) a viaduct. Near (wait for it!) Wolverton. In Buckinghamshire, south-central England. It was built in the 1830s and still carries trains today. Its designer was the famous Robert Stephenson and it is the largest viaduct on his pioneering railway from London to Birmingham (and probably the only one with FA potential). Stephenson was a conservative engineer and Wolverton is not much compared to some that followed, whether by Stephenson or other engineers. These days it would be made with machines and pre-cast concrete but a six-arch, 50ft-high bridge over a major river in what was then open countryside would have been a sight to behold in an era when everything still had to be done by manual labour."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.MarkRosenbaum (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Heyo,
- Just wanted to let you know you can ignore the emailed request as it was taken care of by another user.
- -- MarkRosenbaum (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
You have got mail
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Maliner (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Redacted contribution
[edit]Hi, You redacted my article due to it not being in an encyclopedia style. I have rewritten it in a more appropriate style. I hope it is okay with you to republish the article. Kind regards Ron Binstead Touchscreen1 Touchscreen1 (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Harry, I hope that you're well. I think that I might have now addressed the comments you kindly left in this FAC. Please let me know though if the article needs more work! Regards, Nick-D (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| For bringing an end to the trolling and sockpuppetry garbage here. Thank you for all that you do. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
Hello HJ Mitchell, could you please protect the TP so that IP vandals are not able to post? One IP is currently targeting me. Also, the very page needs to protection (admin-only) for some time, because there are ongoing attempt to POV push cherrypicked material. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 11:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not an IP vandal and stop attacking me like that, I'm just saying that you're blocked from editing Eastern Europe [[1]] and you're doing vandalism again and deleting sources on Wikipedia.[[2]]192.71.144.210 (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- As seen above, not only is this IP talking smack, introducing old and incorrect information, they are stalking as well. — Sadko (words are wind) 11:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Where is the incorrect information that you weren't blocked from editing Eastern Europe, so you were accidentally unblocked by an administrator who didn't know that a few months ago, so you're doing vandalism again. I just looked at your edits and saw that you were blocked for 2-3 years from editing Eastern Europe.192.71.144.210 (talk) 11:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- As seen above, not only is this IP talking smack, introducing old and incorrect information, they are stalking as well. — Sadko (words are wind) 11:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Discussion at User talk:Cmanon § Your username
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Cmanon § Your username. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi HJ Mitchell. Since you seem fairly active at WP:UAA and are also an oversighter, I thought I ask you about this before to see whether it's worth discussing at UAA. As you can see on this user's user talk page, I've mentioned the potential issues with their username a couple of months ago, but they never responded. They, however, showed up again earlier today to edit Christian Manon, which is why it showed up in my watchlist. If there's nothing to worry about here, I'll remove the page from my watchlist and leave things be, except for the outstanding file issues. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly My personal opinion is that if they're not doing anything disruptive, they're probably best left alone but if you want more input, there's WP:RFC/N. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello Harry!
[edit]Would you be so kind to help my new friend Feeglgeef? They could be a good new vandalfighter but they respond badly to criticism and they need more guidance, ideally from an expert vandalfighter such as yourself. We butted heads a bit so they are unlikely to listen to my advice. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Polygnotus What kind of guidance did you have in mind? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I pointed out some imperfect contribs on their talk, but I noticed that there are more. And based on our conversation I worried that they might not fully grok and acknowledge the problems. Because we butted heads I am not really in the position to help them. But you, as a neutral party and as someone who has a lot of experience dealing with vandalism could help them see that not all unexplained content removals should be immediately reverted without investigation. And that User talk:2409:4066:D48:9DEC:2809:B08E:E672:AED2 was not the best way to deal with things. And that it is wise to slow down and carefully check what you are doing. We can always use more vandalfighters, so it is important to not scare them off, while also explaining that not everything is perfect yet and that it is important to listen to feedback. I am not sure how they will respond to my message. Polygnotus (talk) 20:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Wrong block reason for User:SunshineSupport
[edit]Hello! I saw you blocked User:SunshineSupport with the uw-ublock-wellknown template, but that template doesn't make sense. You might have meant to use uw-spamublock or uw-softer-block? Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Helpful Raccoon thanks. Twinkle mis-click (weelknown is the next row down from causeblock). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)