User talk:Admantine123

Information

Hi, if you see edits by XYZ 91973 just revert him (WP:BANREVERT), it's just an obvious sock of this guy who was blocked long time ago. He keeps coming back again and again, trying to do the same things, the same edits with new accounts. Sometimes he changes some things or picks up a related new thing. He will get blocked again and be back with another account. Not to be confused with User:XYZ 250706 who he was trying to impersonate this time. MrMkG (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Let's report him on WP:AIV. Admantine123 (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I have already reported him on WP:SPI, it's just taking time because there is a big backlog there. After he is blocked I am thinking of asking for ECP on a list of pages. MrMkG (talk) 12:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your email

Hi Admantine123, I just found out that you had mailed me thrice quite some time back, but it remained unnoticed since I hardly open my Wikipedia mailbox unless I get a notification! Today I opened my mailbox since Doug Weller sent an email and left a message on my talk page. I am really sorry; please drop a message like Doug whenever you send me any mail! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 06:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I did it sometimes ago and now that issue is sorted out. Thanks for replying by the way. From next time, I will do like Doug. Admantine123 (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

vandalism

dear @Admantine123, please look at samma tribe and Chudachandra. 2409:4085:8E8D:162F:0:0:8809:2D11 (talk) 07:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Anshul Avijit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anshul Avijit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anshul Avijit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 20:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Shravan Kushwaha

Hello Admantine123, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Shravan Kushwaha, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shravan Kushwaha.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)