User talk:King Mshotinarry

Welcome!

Hello, King Mshotinarry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:King Mshotinarry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ruy (talk) 03:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:King Mshotinarry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:King Mshotinarry, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ruy (talk) 03:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Ruy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Ruy (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it’s still under edits to meet Guidelines King Mshotinarry (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, King Mshotinarry. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! King Mshotinarry, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mia le Roux, you may be blocked from editing. This is the second time you have removed the citation needed templates in the infobox. You did not provide references for unsourced information, that I have challenged under WP:BLP. Please replace them. Sciencefish (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Chidimma.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Chidimma.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@King Mshotinarry, may you say something about where you got this? If it was a screenshot from a free video posted anywhere on YouTube or web, can you say so and of course provide links? If you took (shot) this yourself, you could also say so. This is not personal attack; I even love what you upload but they just need to have a valid licence. Thanks. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got it from her Instagram post, I don’t know what to add, I am quite new in Wikipedia I don’t understand most of the things. Can you please add what they want King Mshotinarry (talk) 10:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@King Mshotinarry Cool, provide the link then. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/C-OA5q6tz-x/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== King Mshotinarry (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@King Mshotinarry I have just visited the link. Unfortunately, the uploader who seem to be MISSA have not yet indicated the licence (permission). In this case, it may be good to contact the uploader themselves, who are the MISSA, and ask for permission to use the image.

If this may take time, then maybe there should be a change in your licence where you have to attribute (indicate) that the owner of the file is Missa who uploaded it on this link. I will change that later if you let me. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aso read this https://blog.squarelovin.com/instagram-marketing/copyright-instagram/#:~:text=By%20agreeing%20to%20Instagram's%20terms,license%20that%20is%20valid%20worldwide. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take over. Make means and necessary measures. Okay that I will go through it. Thanks King Mshotinarry (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]