User talk:KrazeyK007

KrazeyK007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KrazeyK007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of The Flash episodes, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lets see here, what does it take to get my contributions added, when its been confirmed on multiple sources, multiple commercial ads, and multiple outlets. I know 100% you're making a mistake, you self righteous insufferable knowitall. The content in question is known as a four night crossover event, starting with supergirl, continuing on flash and arrow, and concluding on legends. It is NOT a 3 night crossover event, Everywhere on the internet is exploding with information on the 4 night crossover event. And you're telling me that there are no sources confirming this whatsoever? The supergirl wikipedia page allows the content i'm trying to add to flash, arrow, and legends. And now i'm being told it's not appreciated. KrazeyK007 (talk) 02:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of The Flash episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Enlighten me then, I may be new to understanding Wikipedia's rules and regulations, but i've been contributing to Wikia and have no issues with my contributions. Why is it that the Supergirl wikipedia page allows mention of the crossover event with the other CW shows, when Flash, Arrow, & Legends have no mention of the crossover event with Supergirl? i'm not involved in some edit war with someone, i'm just adding information that has been confirmed by multiple sources and media outlets.. All contributions should be welcomed, not monitored and deleted because someone else thinks i am.KrazeyK007 (talk) 02:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the discussion on one page. I've replied to your original post. Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i apologize then, for my out of place and not needed insult. I've dealt with some harrassment on wikia with my contributions, and immediately thought the same thing was happening. KrazeyK007 (talk) 02:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. We simply have firm guidelines about sticking to consensus' when formed by multiple editors, and discussing disagreements. Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]