User talk:MSN12102001

Talk To Me MSN12102001 (talk) 11:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, MSN12102001! Thank you for your contributions. I am SkyGazer 512 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

94th Academy Awards moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 94th Academy Awards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CASSIOPEIA, Updated MSN12102001 (talk) 12:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSN12102001, Thank you for providing the source, we need at least 2 more (the lowest number of significant coverage) independent reliable source of rboth 943 and 94 academy awards. Sources from major newspaper would be good. If you can fight such sources, it means the articles are created WP:TOOSOON. Pl see WP:GOLDENRULE. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CASSIOPEIA, I added two more references, both in the Oscar 2021 and also in the Oscar 2022. I hope it is now correct. Graciously, MSN12102001 (talk) 13:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSN12102001, OK thank you. Pls click the submit button. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSN12102001, Reviewed and thank you for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

93rd Academy Awards moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 93rd Academy Awards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CASSIOPEIA, Updated MSN12102001 (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 93rd Academy Awards has been accepted[edit]

93rd Academy Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 94th Academy Awards has been accepted[edit]

94th Academy Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup[edit]

On 7 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

StudiesWorld (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Avengers: Endgame[edit]

On 22 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Avengers: Endgame, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Yogwi21 (talk) 03:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StudiesWorld: I didn't make those editions with malicious intent. I did them only because there are editors who are still voting (as I wrote in the summary), but the editor already wants to close it without reaching a consensus. Haste makes waste. MSN12102001 (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that's how you see it. However, both of you are edit warring over the header. If it continues, I will bring it up at WP:ANEW. StudiesWorld (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StudiesWorld: Ok, I already stopped. Thanks for the warning. Good work! MSN12102001 (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On pages moves[edit]

Where there is a requested move tag as there was on the 2019 Brazil wildfires page, you should not move the page until the requested move discussion is closed. I wouldn't go and move it back since it likely will close that way, but there is a process to be followed here. --Masem (t) 14:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide bombings[edit]

You have recently created Category:Suicide bombings in 2019. There is no such category tree. Are you planning to build one or should the category be merged to its parents? Dimadick (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Resurrection of the Christ for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Resurrection of the Christ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Resurrection of the Christ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 Uruguayan general election[edit]

On 1 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Uruguayan general election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Li Wenliang[edit]

On 6 February 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Li Wenliang, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Damiski (talk) 22:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in October 2022[edit]

The article Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in October 2022 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 多少战场龙 (talk) 09:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Community restrictions regarding the Russio-Ukrainian war[edit]

Hi MSN12102001,

I have noticed that you have recently edited pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Please note that, due to community consensus documented at WP:GS/RUSUKR, only extended-confirmed editors may make such edits.

When in doubt, please assume that a topic is covered by this restriction. We call this "broadly construed". If this still leaves you unsure about whether a topic is affected by the restriction, feel free to ask on my talk page.

This is not widely announced to newcomers, so I'm not blaming or condemning you for not knowing about this. I'm also not saying that your editing has been problematic in any other way. Your edit may well have been perfectly fine in all other regards, yet may have been removed for this reason.

Additionally, Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has recognized "Eastern Europe or the Balkans" as a generally contentious topic area. Don't worry: The restriction to extended-confirmed editors is about the Russo-Ukrainian War, not the entirety of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. The box below contains standardized advice for everyone.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This may be confusing, so I'll attempt to summarize it:

Only extended-confirmed editors may edit pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Details and exceptions can be found at WP:GS/RUSUKR.
All edits about Eastern Europe and the Balkans, by all users, need to be done with extra care.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in November 2022 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in November 2022, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in November 2022 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in November 2022, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2023 into Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2023. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, MSN12102001. Thank you for your work on The Passion of the Christ: Resurrection - Chapter I. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]