Jump to content

User talk:Alex Noble/Archives/2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Request on 12:39:42, 17 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ivor Speedwell


I would like help in knowing what kind of sources would be appropriate to make this draft article about Reginald Paul acceptable for publication. Much of the information I have about concert performances comes from concert flyers, posters or programmes, not published sources. The feedback from composers on his performances is in original unpublished letters. Some of the information could be referenced by the obituary of Reginald Paul written by his colleague Michael Head, and published in the Royal Academy of Music Magazine (No 207, Spring 1975). Apart from that, I have found a number of mentions on websites, for example in articles about other musicians with whom he played (Suggia, Forbes, Stratton, etc), or listings of concerts (e.g. the 1940s National Gallery concerts). There is also a mention of his Decca record of Walton's piano quartet on a Japanese website (the description and references of the record are in English). I'm not sure which if any of these would be appropriate as references. I would be grateful for any suggestions for making the article publishable.

Ivor Speedwell (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Ivor Speedwell, my first issue was that there was in text citations, but no reference list with the full details at the end - see WP:ADR for information on how to do this.
The main rule for sources is that they should be verifiable, so should have been published. However, if they are published somewhere, how obscure the publication is doesn't really matter, unless more accessible alternatives exist for the same info. They also don't have to be in English. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Request about RfC closure

There is an RfC present here which needs to be closed as commenting time has been elapsed. I request you to please close it with a decision as its no closure is leading to the addition of the content under dispute by it. U1 quattro TALK 18:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

U1Quattro. Apologies, I'm currently a bit busier than usual with uni work. Could you list it at WP:ANRFC#Requests for closure please, or ask another uninvolved user. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I will list it there.U1 quattro TALK 17:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

AFC

​

Hi Alex,

You had moved one of the pages I created to draft space due to insufficient citations and references. I have now updated all the information which can be verified through the cited links.

I would be very much grateful to you if you could publish this page after you review it.

Draft : Rinosh George

Thanks in advance.

Regards, Rienzie06 (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (November 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 11th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Enjoy your thanksgiving --DannyS712 (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Archiving test

Testing stuff ~~ OxonAlex - talk 18:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

THANKS!

Thank you for your help, and could you check my talkpage to see if i did it correctly? also have a very happy new year! James The Bond 007 (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

James The Bond 007, Looks right to me. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the message! Happy Holidays! --Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The Happiness Tour

The last two dates Dec 30th and Dec 31st are not part of the happiness begins tour as they said on their Instagram story 4 days ago that said "Thank you doesn't begin even cover it. We've had such an incredible time seeing you guys over the past few months!! Thank you to each and every person who's come to a show this run. It's felt amazing being back on stage together again and we can't wait to do it again in 2020! #HappinessBeginsTour (2A00:23C7:A088:3D01:A15F:F8A2:3090:E706 (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)) ​

I'd reverted this edit, as it was unsourced. We can't tell people to go and find a source themselves. Although citing social media is generally avoided, because it is not the most reliable of sources, but if you must, please use Template:Cite web to fill in a citation.
Also, no need to ping users on their talk pages, as they are notified when their talk page is edited anyway.
Thanks,
~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you!
Thanks for your writing to me.

Can I ask you simply to edit or post it properly then my contribution to AALC disambiguation page, I was trying to edit it good as possible, but probably that's not been enough referring facts relied to the abbreviator "AALC". 

"AALC" have too and other association which I contribute, and knowing the limitation and the options which can be used for  disambiguation page I done all my best. I wasn't sure only do I'm allowed to add References to the  Disambiguation page.

Or are you able then to notice me all my mistakes/errors I done, because "external links" if I read properly the help contribution wiki pages aren't forbidden. Isn't for advertising, it's for simple explanation to what may refer "AALC" which come on the search engines and on WIKIPEDIA as wrong or not complete information. I don't post spam or advertising there, otherwise from the point of view you have to "edit"/remove and few other associations relied to "AALC" which the same way come as advertising or spam. Thank you in advance! If you decide to done the editing properly, you have the source from the history.

Best Regards Georgi Mihaylov / SHNICI (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

@SHNICI: The purpose of a disambiguation page is to list all of our articles that could be reached by a certain term. For example, if someone enters an acronym into search, search can't know which article the user wanted, so a list of all the possible options is given. As the purpose of these pages is to direct users to actual articles, content that isn't a link and short description of an article isn't placed on them ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Thank you for the explanation, so I do miss understand when I read about the disambiguation pages!

Sorry about the "troubles" I done.

Best Regards Georgi Mihaylov / SHNICI (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

thanks for the speedy correction of the speedy deletion

It was too quick for me as I am moving material from main sandbox to this temporary sub-page, to make the main sandbox useable and easier to read. Thank you for fixing it to avoid me losing all the material collated.

A Short History of Nearly Everything

Would you be so kind and take a look at my recently removed and archived modification to the article A Short History of Nearly Everything. The required citations were internal Wikipedia links. Jonas B. 05:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonasBacelis (talk • contribs)

 Done. Undid reversion. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 05:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Reverting off-topic posts helps our counter-vandalism effort, and we need your help.

I noticed that you chose to converse, rather than revert an off-topic post, even noting that the prior message was a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM. You are correct in your assessment, but replying to the original poster causes problems per WP:TPO. We are free to simply revert off-topic posts, but once more than a single editor is posting the conversation has to be hidden or archived, but never deleted unless it was oversighted, which doesn't apply here. That talk page gets a lot of off-topic posts from new users that cannot read simple instructions. Our archives will overflow with such wasteful comments when we serve Wikipedia better by just reverting and issuing a warning, as I did. In the future, please nip the problem in the bud by stopping off-topic posts. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year OxonAlex!

Happy New Year!
Hello OxonAlex:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Page Still Under Review | Help

Hi Sir, As per your last edits on the draft page Roney Singh I have modified the contents. It's been resubmitted for review. It's been days since I've heard something. Can you please review the regarding article? I'm hereby attaching the draft link of the submitted article. url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roney_Singh It'll be very helpful. It'll be really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepjoy66 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from WP:STiki!

The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
Congratulations, OxonAlex! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki.

We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool.

We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Self Driving Cars

We should ban self driving vehicles. Long live human driving! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.202.177.234 (talk) 09:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTOPINION ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Invite to use WikiLoop Battlefield

Hi OxonAlex,

I found that you are a power user for the counter-vandalism tool STiki. First of all, Kudos! Thank you for help protecting Wikipedia.

Secondly, we are building a new web-based counter-vandalism tool, hoping to make it easier to use, and wonder if you would be interested in giving it a try here: http://battlefield.wikiloop.org, and kindly give us feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiLoop Battlefield, thank you!

We currently started whitelist for DIRECT ROLLBACK features, if you are interested, ask us at Wikipedia talk:WikiLoop Battlefield too. User:Xinbenlv (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Untitled

Please i want you to help review my draft please

Naijafield (talk) 12:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for helping me in the Teahouse. I appreciate how nice everyone is here! King of Scorpions (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Ah, I see, thanks.

Thank you. I went back and edited it again, but this time only with the missing rotten tomatoes number. No words like "wonderfull" in the edits. Just one small update to the number.

I just have let my personal like for the movie accidentally influence the words, but don't worry, it's bias free now.

Thanks, Hælfden

. Hælfden (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (December 2019 and January 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 12th issue issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alex_Noble/Archives/2&oldid=1145985848"