User talk:Patatasan

September 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Normal, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 15:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up! I'll try and be more cautious of the Manual of Style. Patatasan (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:WTAF. Once you have written an article you can start to link it into others, but not before it has been published. Do not link from other articles to your draft. --10mmsocket (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, noted. Thanks for your help! Patatasan (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Design fiction, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop spamming this organisation. As an employee of the organisation you have a clear conflict of interest. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I’m sorry, I'm looking at other entries in this very section and only seeking to add relevant context. This is not about spamming (as you can see this is edit comes with a proper source) but about substantiating this section on how design fiction applies to public policy with a very relevant example. I’m not sure in which way this differs from the above reference in this section, other than it may be even more to the point of the topic. Also, yes: I’m part of an “organization” that is represented here, one of them, as it was a team effort with the European Commission. Would it be preferable to edit the wiki anonymously so as to not trigger these kinds of accusations? Patatasan (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous or with account, you have declared a conflict of interest and should avoid adding such material. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly my point. I was being transparent, but by your reaction I'm guessing transparency isn't valued and I would have been better off hiding my identity to add anything of relevance that relates to my field. Lesson learned. Patatasan (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N O R M A L S (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Which are the three best sources which establish the subject's notability? Interviews are not secondary sources, please ensure the references are independent of the subject and reliable publishers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N O R M A L S and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patatasan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N O R M A L S (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N O R M A L S and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]