Jump to content

User talk:Nomen ad hoc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Pro patria semper)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Pro patria semper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! satusuro 22:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Front (France) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Category:Jean-Marie Le Pen]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JB

[edit]

Hey there. The edit on the French page was not done by me - I have no problem signing my edits.

Did I misunderstand the exchange on your talk-page, or is the Rinko87-sockpuppet confirmed? Otherwise I'll request a checkuser/sockpuppet investigation.

One last thing: How come you reverted the change on the French page regarding the "collaboration with Noam Chomsky"? Do you seriously consider a single interview mostly done by someone else a "collaboration" that deserves mention on a Wikipedia page? Could you please explain why?

Regards, Hybris1984 (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hybris1984!
Thank you for this precision—it might have been you, isn't it?
Eventually, MarceloBielsa (Juan Branco) neither confirmed nor denied Rinko87 was his sockpuppet. You don't speak french, don't you?
I reverted the change concerning JB's collaboration with Chomsky, but also with Badiou, because it is proven by Durand's article. Of course, I didn't consider that a sole interview would have sufficed instead.
— Regards, Pro patria semper 12:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Wasn't me...
If you check the history of the discussion page for the French article, you'll see the confirmation for the sockpuppet. He wrote his long contribution under the alias MarceloBielsa, continued to make some changes and then switched accounts to Rinko87, changing a few more things and writing: "intervention sur ma propre page : pardon pour les modifications multiples, mais parlant en mon nom sur une plateforme publique, je me permets de tenter d'être le plus précis possible..."
As to the Chomsky-thing... Thanks for providing the source, but I'm sorry to say: I remain unconvinced. I do not question that he was part of an interview conducted by his father... (which is all the Inrock...-article says). I do however question that this a) constitutes a collaboration and b) is noteworthy enough for Wikipedia.
Sorry for being so adamant about this, but now that I know Rinko87 is merely a sockpuppet, I am ticked off and rather suspicious. Once a liar... and all that.
Regards, Hybris1984 (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't see this message comment. So Rinko87 is actually a sockpuppet.
I don't know what to say about "the Chomsky-thing"... We could discuss our points of view (with, for example, Daehan, but also others) on the French version talk page?
— Regards, Pro patria semper 14:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - we can do that. -- Hybris1984 (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Nomen ad hoc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

[edit]

Bonjour. Comme vous pouvez vous en rendre compte, je ne suis plus actif sur Wikipédia depuis près de 3 ans me semble-t-il, ni en anglais ni en français mais seulement sur Commons, donc je m'excuse si je prends connaissance de ce message avec retard. Ce brouillon est un espèce de pense-bête qui contient effectivement des articles dont l'admissibilité a été remise en cause il y a des années sur Wikipédia en français et dont le bandeau a été enlevé sans raison par des comptes sûrement bien intentionnés et qui n'ont donc jamais été traités par une proposition PàS. Cette liste étant visible par tous, aussi peut-elle servir à tout un chacun pour lancer des propositions de maintenance (pourquoi pas vous ?) et il semble d'ailleurs que certains articles de cette liste l'aient déjà été. Cordialement, Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vu. NAH 14:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Twitter from Wikidata

[edit]

I suggest you purge every article where you remove the username parameter from the Twitter template, because an error will show otherwise. You might still catch it at Bruno Covas. More fundamentally, I don't see the need for such edits, on their own, at all. They're borderline disruptive. -- Michael Bednarek (talk)

Done. I don't find it disruptive; eventually, I aimed at clearing out this cat. NAH 13:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

clearing out category:Twitter username not in Wikidata

[edit]

Nomen ad hoc, thanks for the explanation, would have known firsthand if it was in the edit summary before I reverted. – Rick (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, apologies. NAH 14:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

École normale supérieure

[edit]

Hi! I’m stopping by because of your page move here. En.wiki handles disambiguation pages differently than on fr.wiki. The word “disambiguation” in parentheses added to the title means either: 1) the page is a disambiguation page itself (which is not an article, but a navigation guide to get to the right article) OR 2) the page is a redirect to a disambiguation page. No other page should have “(disambiguation)” in its title.

I’ve asked the people at WP: RMT to put things back in order. (And voilà! it’s done.) For a brief intro to disambiguation (dab) pages, see Help:Disambiguation. For the full details, read Wikipedia:Disambiguation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation.

Happy editing! — Gorthian (talk) 09:35, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, Gorthian! Best regards. NAH 12:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nomen ad hoc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2023-02 Wikidata

[edit]

Je tiens à vous féliciter pour les innombrables fiches Wikidata sur des personnes d'extrême-droite que vous avez crées, merci infiniment. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour chère Visite,
merci pour vos félicitations. Que venez-vous, depuis que vous avez été bloquée sur Wikidata ?
Cordialement, NAH 19:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]