User talk:Reema m h

October 2010

November 2010 (UTC) {{unblock|I want to update and correct the old information as wikipedia rules and referenced it}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I want to update and correct the old Julphar information as wikipedia rules and referenced itReema m h (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is spamming. For us to consider your request you need to explain what changes you plan to make, and why they will not be self-promoting. Tiptoety ^talk 07:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|<reema@julphar.net>}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

<reema@julphar.net>

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock. Please see the comment made by Tiptoety in response to the previous unblock request.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please can you unblock my account and my Ip address I want to update and correct julphar page and referenced it as wikipedia rules and make it non-advertising

Decline reason:

You still have not addressed the reason for your block: spamming. Danger ^{High voltage!} 08:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Please unblock Julphar article I want to insert the julphar new logo}}

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reema m h. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you please unlock my account (reema_m_h) because I want to update Julphar article information. Julphar article need more updates and references please help me I want to edit julphar article. The blocked happened becouse of (Abusing multiple accounts disabled by DoRD ) and I am very very sorry for that I will not do this again. I want to edit julphar old information with the information in the following link Julphar updated information

Decline reason:

Vowing to go back to editing the article on which you have such a poor track record is not promising. Furthermore, please don't remove declined unblock notices when the block is still in place. It is expressly forbidden according to WP:BLANKING. Favonian (talk) 09:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-auto|...}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock Julphar article I want to insert the julphar new logo. I understand my error and I will not do it again reema mahmoud 6:06 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the issues leading to your block (simply saying, "I understand," isn't good enough - what do you understand? Which policies did you break? How will you go about following those policies in future?).
Please do not make more than one unblock request at a time; I have closed the other requests higher on this page. If you continue to make disruptive requests that do not address your block, your talkpage access will be removed; I strongly suggest you read the guide to appeals and make your next one count - it will probably be your last. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

213.42.193.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Reema m h". The reason given for Reema m h's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/

Blocking administrator: DoRD (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are blocked directly. If you are seeing an autoblock message then you are likely attempting to use your IP to edit or create a new account; that is block evasion and will only result in additional IP blocks and sanctions. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. reema mahmoud

Editing from Reema m h has been blocked (disabled) by DoRD for the following reason(s):

Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reema m h

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reema m h (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is blocked because Abusing multiple accounts by DoRD and Iam very sorry I understand my mistake I will not do that again and I need to unblock my account reema_m_h to edit julphar article I want to change the logo to new julphar logo as in www.julphar.net reema mahmoud 05:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As was stated before, asking to go back to the article you were blocked for editing is not the way to get unblocked. Especially when you've been accused of sockpuppetry. I am not only declining this request, I am revoking your talk page access so you won't waste any other admin's time with this. Goodbye. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Julphar-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Julphar-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]