User talk:Mpesca1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TVMARKETS.MP, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Tradeview Markets, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DrowssapSMM 05:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tradeview Markets[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tradeview Markets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrowssapSMM 05:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tradeview Markets (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tradeview Markets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrowssapSMM 05:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TVMARKETS.MP! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrowssapSMM 05:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mpesca1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Mpesca1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry I didn´t know about username policy, I thought I can use a structured name

Decline reason:

That would be okay as a new username, but your username is only one small aspect of the block, you need to discuss your inappropriate edits that violated WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID and tell us what topics you will edit about instead now that you know that, in the near term, you won't be permitted to edit about your company. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new posts at the bottom to maintain a chronological order. This may be easier to do if you click "Edit" at the top and not "Reply". 331dot (talk) 08:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email, I do not discuss Wikipedia matters via email unless very sensitive personal information is involved. Before you worry about submitting an article you need to get unblocked, please make a new request. 331dot (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please place posts at the bottom. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He reverted me when I moved the request to the bottom of the page. PhilKnight (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles is very hard. I recommend gaining more experience editing before trying to do so. Reverting moving the latest request to the bottom raises WP:CIR issues. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamer note:[edit]

User has been renamed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mpesca1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I´ll leave this article that I was trying to create, and I´ll start to collaborate as supposed to be, I´d like to continue and I´ll change my name. I´m Learning and thank you for understanding and I´ll do my best to create articles about women's in the Gambling Industry and about some technological terms

Decline reason:

New requests go at the bottom of the page per WP:BOTTOMPOST, yet you reverted a change that moved this new request to the bottom. You mentioned that you'll start to collaborate as supposed to be but this is not a good indication of a spirit of collaboration. This unblock request does not address 31dot's comment in the previous unblock request, specifically that you need to discuss your inappropriate edits that violated WP:PROMO,WP:COI, and WP:PAID. Please keep new comments and unblock requests at the bottom of the page and take a moment to address the concerns and questions previously raised. Aoidh (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.