Jump to content

User talk:Tinywc111

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Tinywhitechick)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi, Tinywhitechick. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. GABHello! 17:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ingrid Veninger
added links pointing to Northern Lights, NOW Magazine and Only
Bruce McDonald (director)
added a link pointing to Vancouver Film Festival

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meg Tilly. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Your original change was without edit summary. You have now restored your edit without edit summary. This is edit warring and that can result in a block. I will restore the original content. Please see WP:BRD and start a discussion if you think your change is justified. --Mirokado (talk) 23:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As far as I can see you were editing while I was preparing the above message. Your edits have resulted in no change as far as I can see, so the message is no longer relevant. It does however emphasise the importance of always providing an edit summary (even if you can find examples of other editors who never bother). I truly hope you enjoy editing here. --Mirokado (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Tinywc111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]