Jump to content

User talk:Buí

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Victor Kbça)

Live scores

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a live news source. Please do not add live scores to articles pertaining to sporting events. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hulk - Reply

[edit]

Hi there BUÍ, VASCO from Portugal here,

Sorry for my actions in this footballer's article. I should not have removed the text in the "JAPAN" section, it was a big improvement for the article, i have already reinstated it, except for the bit where it says "was purchased by Porto", that belongs in the following section, "PORTO".

In that section #2, i only removed a bit that was not very clearly written and contained redirect - Sporting C.P. is not the name of the club's article.

That said, again sorry for any incovenience, keep up the good work, have a good week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oi BUI, aqui VASCO,

se reparares bem, a referência #1 e a #3 dizem anos coisas diferentes: a primeira diz que só jogou no Vitória, a outra diz que esteve no São Paulo FC até aos 16 anos. Seja como for, é-me indiferente, não é importante para a carreira do jogador e o seu artigo na WP, não me vou chatear com ninguém por causa disso.

Bom fim de semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question re. Ronaldinho

[edit]

Regarding this revision - nowhere does it say on the infobox that only apps/goals for the national league count. The previous editor who reverted it didn't use an edit summary, how on earth am I supposed to know? XXX antiuser eh? 03:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blues win

[edit]

Good edit and timely. Wikipedia 1: Encyclopedia Britannica 0

Dinoceras (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oi BUI, VASCO aqui,

por favor, não ponhas essa seção no D.LUIZ, é muito grande para um clube obscuro (terceira divisão), não ponhas ou então vamos trabalhá-la.

Já me disseram aqui na WP que não é "bem-vindo" o detalhe (quase jogo a jogo, como fizeste tu), ainda por cima ele só lá jogou um ano. Lembro-me de ver o Pedro Rodríguez Ledesma, e tinha lá, antes de eu "trabalhar" o artigo, todos os jogos feitos pela primeira equipa do FC Barcelona, TODOS! Não achas demais?

Abraços, aguardo resposta - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Meu caro, estive a ver o texto todo e, na verdade, acho que é totalmente desnecessário, mesmo que referenciado ("ele jogou cinco partidas de seguida", depois "perdeu um jogo por lesão" e depois "jogou mais nove encontros de seguida"; e para quê falar de jogos em que ele nem sequer jogou?). Compus o melhor que pude, por favor não voltes a pôr toda essa informação. Além do mais, procurei para ti a discussão em que me disseram que não se deve por informação detalhada (jogo a jogo - volto a referir, sobretudo jogos que ele não jogou não têm relevância nenhuma) na carreira dos jogadores (por favor vê aqui, como vês não estou a mentir - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_45#Storylines_on_players)

Também fiz o seguinte: iniciei uma discussão em WP:FOOTY (ver aqui http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Needed_info.3F), podes deixar a tua opinião e veremos no que dá...

Saudações portuguesas - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ba–Vi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 16:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]