User talk:Immortal Horrors or Everlasting Splendors
![]() | Please note Collapsed comments are my way of acknowledgement (as opposed to deletion). If you wish to add to a collapsed discussion please uncollapse it and we can discuss. I will recollapse it when our conversation has run its course. Thank you. |
Welcome + Comment
[edit]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
− Regarding this edit of your on Talk:Intelligent design, it is considered very bad form to modify someone else's signed comments. Please don't do so in the future. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 05:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
TY
[edit]
Thanks! Collect (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Scheer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Children's Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC) |
WP:CAT
[edit]
Hello. I would urge you to read Wikipedia:Categorization, especially the part about set categories as opposed to topic categories. Set categories are "designed" in such a way that "if an article is something that fits the name of a category, then it belongs in it". If you're a gold medalist in basketball, then you belong in the gold medalist category. If you're not, you don't. It's really as simple as that. As people cannot be scandals – only events can – people obviously don't belong in scandal categories. So, when you found that Category:State and local political sex scandals in the United States contained more people than those that I found and corrected, you drew the wrong conclusion. The correct conclusion is that all other people articles there are also miscategorized. These are the few articles that are correctly placed in the category:
Of each and every one of these, you can say that "yes, it is a state and local political sex scandal in the United States". You obviously can't say that about people. See also the notice at the top of this category: Category:Political scandals in the United States. If you're still in doubt, please tell me what type of political scandal Todd Courser is – state or local? Or both? I guess the reason why people articles sometimes slip into the wrong type of categories is that you don't edit the categories to place articles there. Thus it doesn't help to have the categories on your watchlist. The only thing that helps is to revisit the categories every now and then – and that's a Sisyfos task. I trust you will self-revert after having given it some thought. Cheers. HandsomeFella (talk) 23:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
|
RFC regarding AAU subsection.
[edit]
Hey, I'm just dropping you a note because you previously participated in this RfC on the Campus Sexual assault Talk page. The dispute was never really resolved, in part because of a lack of participation. I've posted a new RfC that deals with the issue, and, if you have time comments would be appreciated! Nblund (talk) 18:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC) |
Request for Comments regarding faith healing and pseudoscience
[edit]Hello, you previously participated in a request for comments regarding whether faith healing and whether it is a pseudoscience. I would like to inform you that there is currently an open request for comments that is revisiting this question that you might be interested in participating in. I am notifying everybody who participated in the previous request for comments.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 09:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)