User talk:WikiLoveNow

June 2016

Hello, I'm Kelapstick. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Bearcat has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are nominating a user's talk page for deletion, and you are editing the maximum archive size for their talk page. This is disruptive, and if you continue you will be blocked from editing. Leave a message if you want, about the article in question, but do not nominate the page for deletion, or change archive settings. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Kelapstick, you may be blocked from editing. Adam9007 (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Adam9007. Adam9007 (talk) 21:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]