User talk:Zapptastic
Nomination of Mary Marques for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Marques is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Marques until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Ontario highway 102.gif[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Ontario highway 102.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Post by User:LeannJordan[edit]
Help me to post these correctly. Leanne
- Hello Z. I moved this to the bottom of the page so that you wouldn't have to search for it. MarnetteD|Talk 16:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
THANK YOU... I figured it out. Leanne — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeannJordan (talk • contribs) 17:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!!![edit]
Happy First Edit Day[edit]
|
Happy First Edit Day, Zapptastic, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! †2†ťəäçħ†4†ӛṿəř 22:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
†2†ťəäçħ†4†ӛṿəř 22:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
A cupcake for you![edit]
|
(Here's a cupcake to go along with your birthday card :-) †2†ťəäçħ†4†ӛṿəř 22:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of Laurence Hughes[edit]
Not sure it this is the 'correct' procedure, but I was somewhat puzzled as to why the short contribution I made about myself as a British composer with performances in the concert hall, on radio and on TV in the UK and elsewhere was deleted some time ago. I suspect I am 'not allowed' to write about myself, perhaps? Maybe somebody else would like to write something? - I would be happy to help with any information about myself and my work. I feel that as many other classical composers of no more than equal 'importance' have articles on Wikipedia, it seems only logical that I should, too. Can you please explain to me (in simple and non-technical terms) if and why you think I shouldn't? What is the general policy on living creative artists, and how does it work? Lahgbr (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Grey Baskerville has left the building[edit]
After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 06:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Northstar Commuter Coach.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
"Devastator(Ratchet and Clank)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Devastator(Ratchet and Clank). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 23#Devastator(Ratchet and Clank) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 03:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Trinity School at Greenlawn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails GNG, very promo
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Metro Transit Routes[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Metro Transit Routes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Northstar Commuter Coach.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Northstar Commuter Coach.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
History of Plastic Pants[edit]
I ran across an article you edited years ago Plastic pants; without a single attribution of any kind. I would like to improve the article but I cannot find links to support the following thereby leaving the article unsourced and subject to removal.. As a new user; What would you suggest be done?
History[edit] == At the turn of the 20th century, oiled silk was used as a waterproofing medium in adult clothing, but not until latex rubber was commercially available in the 1920s did the idea of wearing a protective garment become commonplace. Ladies' panties were worn with a waterproof latex crotch insert or a waterproof panel in the back of an underskirt, to make coping with heavy menstruation cycles easier and socially safer. The original diaper covers were made from oiled wool, which was naturally waterproof. Newly available latex pants for covering diapers reduced the difficulties in caring for young children on long journeys, on special social occasions, and overnight.
During the 1950s, plastics, mainly PVC, replaced latex on account of their lower cost, ease of maintenance, and lack of noise when handled. However, the history of these garments has influenced their modern names: “Rubber pants” and “Rubbers” are used commonly to mean waterproof pants of all kinds, even though they are typically now made of plastic rather than latex.
The invention of superabsorbent polymers (for diapers and incontinence pads), and blood-gelling polymers (for sanitary pads) largely displaced traditional cloth diapers and pads. Not only were these modern absorbent materials lighter and less bulky, but they became available as an “all-in-one” solution with their own integral waterproof plastic backing. This eliminated the need for separate waterproof underwear in many situations. Nevertheless, waterproof pants are still used as a second line of defense where absolute protection from leakage is crucial.
Effectiveness[edit] == The development of plastic pants contributed significantly to juvenile fashion. Until the late 1950s, infants of both sexes usually wore short dresses until they were ready for toilet training thus avoiding the risks to clothing and hygiene of having top clothes in prolonged close contact with a damp or soiled diaper. Effective and easily obtainable waterproofing – whether integral with the pad or as separate pants – safely allowed a child to be dressed in trousers. The development of disposable diapers made the fit of clothing even neater as the new diapers were less bulky than the cloth ones.
Flibbertigibbets (talk) 02:19, 18 October 2022 (UTC)