Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/19th century

Nominated on 14:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC); needs 15 votes by January 6.

Ridiculously small article. Compare to 20th century. Should be easy to write, too.

Support:

BRIAN0918 14:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
ike9898 16:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pyro19 20:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As2431 08:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Gflores ^Talk 21:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SoothingR^(pour) 13:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
– Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 03:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rampart 12:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Astrokey44 13:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 01:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Darwinek 16:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
JustinWick 23:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Soul assassin 16:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is ridiculously short. An improvment is needed. As2431 08:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, ridiculously tiny. Gflores ^Talk 21:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - A very important century, lets get this article in shape! - JustinWick 23:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - The 20th century article is badly written. Please stick to the template for century articles - Wikipedia:Timeline standards. --Brunnock 01:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]