Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Croatia national football team results (1991–99)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Croatia national football team results (1991–99)[edit]

Featured list candidates/Croatia national football team results (1991–99)/archive1

Nominator(s): Governor Sheng (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I consider that the list could be interesting to many readers of Wikipedia as it shows historical results of the Croatia national football team, a vice-champion of the FIFA World Coup. It contains many details about football matches played by the Croatia national team between 1940 and 1999, including: scorers, referees, yellow/red cards, stadiums etc. Moreover, unlike other similar pages, this one has a special style, which, in my opinion, is the most simple, navigable and best looking of all others. To be understood no unfiorm code was broken by introducing this style of listing the results, since similar pages use different styles. Governor Sheng (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In its current state, of being a hodgepodge list of various vastly different states masquerading under the adjective "national", there's no way this should be a featured list. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I split the article since. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - right now, this falls far short of the standards required of a featured list. There needs to be a significant expansion of the lead to adequately cover the timespan the list covers, detailing tournaments, notable incidents etc to start. Kosack (talk) 10:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Agreeing with Kosack on the lack of significant prose. Not to mention the lack of inline references and the use of Hrnogomet, which looks to be debatable as a reliable source. Sounder Bruce 08:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - well short of FL standard -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.