Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Catopsilia pomona by kadavoor.JPG

Catopsilia pomona[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2012 at 11:36:30 (UTC)

Reason: including Quality image lable, Technicla framing and EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Catopsilia pomona
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Jkadavoor

Support as nominator --Alborzagros (talk) 11:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I prefer the angle of File:Catopsilia_pomona.jpg because that shows more of this insect's front anatomy. Also, I think that this nomination should specify that the subject is a male since the female has some differences in appearance. Pine^✉ 04:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The picture you mentioned has got 108 KB however It is well-angled. We can type sex of butterfly to keep it from risk of not promoting of Photo. in the other hand sex is not important and technical criticism. Alborzagros (talk) 06:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case I wasn't clear before, let me say that I am not suggesting that the other photo would be FP quality. I'm just saying that I like the angle better. Regarding the caption, yes that can easily be fixed. Pine^✉ 07:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as creator Yes; a straight AOV is better than an inclined one. The only reason for this AOV is the situation that didn't permit me to lower the camera any further. Specifying of sex is valuable too. I personally prefer the female picture which more in my taste of capture. BTW, this butterfly has an interesting behavior to perch inclined to expose one side at a time to the sunlight. Later it turn around to expose the other side. There are some other butterflies who bask with closed wings but I didn't see any other butterfly perch inclined (other than dead leaf butterflies but that is not for basking). -- Jkadavoor (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm with Pine here, the other angle shows the butterfly much better. This is a good picture, but I don't think it quite up to FP standards, Even then, I won't oppose it. --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 19:40, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]